So it sounds like the antichrist and his people are either insane or have no free will. Since they certainly didn't exist when Revelations was written, and would almost certainly be literate to read it before doing anything, they know the outcome. So how can someone who is simply forced to do things by an all-powerful puppetmaster be evil? It's like condemning Judas. It makes no sense. Without his actions, there's no crucifixion and no redemption of everyone's souls. If your "bad guys" are just playing their predetermined parts, then they're not bad. And then there's no free will. The antichrist is a human. The only angel in Revelations is Lucifer, and he only shows up for the last chapter. It's a story about humans making human choices. But apparently people don't actually get to make those choices, they're already made for them.
And when you say "they know they have no chance but they will try anyway", I have a hard time not imagining heroic underdogs. That's the sort of thing that Luke Skywalker and Han Solo say about opposing the Empire. It's what Frodo and Sam say about taking the ring to Mt. Doom.
Obviously, I'm evaluating this from a literary standpoint, but if you think this is actually going to happen, and these will be real people, then you have to deal with the theological implications. The prophecy, by its very existence, either means that it is self-defeating and the people who read it will change the story, or it means that they can't change the story despite reading it and thus have no free will. Your answers lean towards the second option. And since the story of Revelations involves most of the human race choosing to live in the antichrist's worldwide empire, none of us apparently have free will, either. But we deserve horrific punishment for choices we weren't allowed to make in the first place. How do you reconcile this problem?