• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Noetic science

Your previous post seemed hostile toward the guy, no big deal I was just wondering why.

You have a knack at seeing hostility where it doesn't exist. Perhaps you psychically "saw" it. Front porch philosopher?
 
You have a knack at seeing hostility where it doesn't exist. Perhaps you psychically "saw" it. Front porch philosopher?

"Strange that he relied purely on science when his ass was on the line, but pushes other philosophies when it doesn't have any consequences if he is wrong."

Seems a bit hostile to me but if it doesn't seem hostile to you we can honestly disagree I guess.
 
At least he didn't drive around wearing a diaper.
 
Just out of curiosity, what is your view on religion-spiritualism in general?

We have acquired enough unbiased, objective, knowledge by now to be absolutely certain that religion is the creation of human imagination and nothing more. This is true from the pre-historic spirit gods, to the BCE civilizations with recorded histories, to our times and to all time in the future. Even if you only consider the hundreds of millions of years that the dinosaurs ruled the planet, and that no mammal had evolved yet, you have to wonder, where were all those gods that the human imagination created to explain the un-explainable around them?

All religion puts the human in the center of the universe. We already know that this false and it's easy to realize that this need for belief to a supernatural entity is a psychological drive, I call it a dysfunction, that attempts to give an answer to the existential question of who are we, why are we here and what happens after we die.

What happens is that bio-mass disintegrates, like all other dead things have been doing for the billions of years of life on the planet.

Besides biology though, there is a legitimate inquiry about the nature of intelligence -- not related to any religious obfuscation of the term -- that philosophy is trying to examine and figure out, but that's a different issue that is completely irrelevant to religion.
 
Back
Top Bottom