I already proved all your questions to be incoherent.
False. It is impossible to answer a logically incoherent question. A logically incoherent idea is something like a married bachelor, since a bachelor cannot be married, or a female Catholic priest, since a Catholic priest cannot be a woman. You can mimic an answer by saying yes or no, but this has no semantic meaning. Frankly, this is a concept of advanced logic that I fear you may not be understanding.
This is false. Incoherence is a matter of strict definition, not opinion. That an married bachelor is incoherent is a fact. Likewise, that a female Catholic priest is incoherent is also a fact. This is not a matter of opinion. Do you see yet how fundamentally wrong you are?
This is incoherent, for the reasons stated above. There cannot be a female pope, it is a contradiction in terms. Maleness is essential to popeness.
Still false, no matter how many times you incorrect assert it.
Yes, see above.
I have not denied any facts, you have. I would venture to guess that your persistent Catholic-bashing gives you some sort of peace. Why you continue to argue against points of elementary logic, though, I cannot understand.
There are no facts that have been denied by me. Why do you continue to deny that when an adjective contradicts the essential properties of the noun it modifies, the idea is internally contradictory and therefore logically incoherent?
