- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 45,596
- Reaction score
- 22,537
- Location
- Everywhere and nowhere
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
So far you have done everything to avoid answering my post:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/religion-philosophy/43900-question-believers-7.html#post1057939641
You keep on putting up all little technicalities of red herrings, strawmen and ad homs. Now you are completely changing the subject.
You actions are an undeniable confirmation of the points I made in post, - that CC and you and some other atheists attacking SS are very immoral and unreasonable and should not lecture SS who exhibits some reason and morality.
As to you question, it is another attempt to get me in some way on something not related to my post. As a rule such attempts caused not by desire to raise an argument to the points stated but desire to get one who states the post are designated to failure. Even if you could it is has no relevance. But you can’t – as it has been proven your lack of minimal moral and reason, it has been proven you can’t.
You've never actually posted anything coherent enough to warrant a reply from me.
In fact, I've never seen you make anything that remotely resembled an intelligent thought.
Last edited: