scourge99
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 6,233
- Reaction score
- 1,462
- Location
- The Wild West
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
The claims made in this post are numerous. I will handle them one at a time.
Lord' Raglan's Hero Pattern
There were plenty of sects who did not believe in the divinity of Jesus including Unitarian Universlists today who would claim to be Christian.
Which parts of the texts are accurate? Accuracy would presume there is some way to confirm or verify the accuracy? What makes them accurate? Are the events that transpire in the book Gone with the Wind accurate because Gone with the Wind mentions non-fictional people, events and places? I think not.and the texts are pretty painstakingly accurate; not to mention numerous and pretty close to time-of-writing.
That depends on which version of the Bible you read. Why do you believe there are so mnay variations of Bibles and manuscripts? According to Bart Ehrman, there are more variations in our manuscripts of the New Testament than there are WORDS in the New testament. Granted most are minor variations, but some such as Jesus "saving an adulteress from stoning" and the last 10 verses of Mark (maybe Matthew I forget) are strongly believed by most scholars to be additions and alterations to the texts. Some more questioned passages are the ones depicting Jesus sweating blood and the ones confirming trinitarian concepts and divinity concepts.Jesus claimed on multiple occasions to be God,
Only if we assume that the texts are a non-fictional reports of events. We have no reason to conclude they are. We only have fervent believers who claim they are and the book claiming that it is true. Not exactly convincing evidence for anyone who does not already accept them is truth.which is why he was eventually killed.
Who says he even existed or was even executed? We don't have any corroborating evidence that such an event occurred. Jesus fits all the characteristics of a myth.there would have been no reason to kill "just a really nice guy who's a new scholar" who nonetheless refused to rebel against or theologically back any earthly authority.
Lord' Raglan's Hero Pattern
THis is the classical "no true scottsman" fallacy.[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman]No true Scotsman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]All Christians believe he is God; that is literally the central belief of our religion. you can call yourself whatever you like, but deny that and you are not a Christian, you are something else. Gnosticism (like most heresies) is not new.
There were plenty of sects who did not believe in the divinity of Jesus including Unitarian Universlists today who would claim to be Christian.