TheHat
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 177
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Well it was what, 2 weeks ago when that brilliant government task force, without any oncologists on it, came out telling us all how women over 40 dont need regular mammograms. Remember that?
Then we were all told it wont lead to rationing care.:rofl
Well, 1st up to do just that is *drumroll* California!:2wave:
Yep, look to California, the state that is in total and complete meltdown financially, to stick it to the very people, all liberals claim to want to help with these types of programs, the poor.
Reason # 4,000,000 not to go UHC.
Meanwhile the ACS, (American Cancer Society) the real experts on cancer, say to have mammograms yearly starting at 40.
Who do you want to trust your livelyhood to?
REGION: State ends subsidy for mammograms to low-income women under 50
Then we were all told it wont lead to rationing care.:rofl
Well, 1st up to do just that is *drumroll* California!:2wave:
Yep, look to California, the state that is in total and complete meltdown financially, to stick it to the very people, all liberals claim to want to help with these types of programs, the poor.
Reason # 4,000,000 not to go UHC.
Meanwhile the ACS, (American Cancer Society) the real experts on cancer, say to have mammograms yearly starting at 40.
Who do you want to trust your livelyhood to?
REGION: State ends subsidy for mammograms to low-income women under 50