But didn't you just say government officials aren't corrupt? Now you're saying they are. Oh I get it just republicans are pure but democrats are corrupt.
Your reading dyslexia is only superseded by your inability to deal with credible facts and logical reasoning.
Why don't you post my words stating that Government officials are not corrupt so we can solve your issues with reading comprehension once and for all.
Again with the "czars" several of which were confirmed by the senate, had been in prior appointments, are cabinet level positions or are in jobs that were created by previous presidents. Did you complain about Bush's 46 czars? Thought not.
Only about 15 of those positions were from previous posts while Obama created about 15 new ones in an effort, as many Democrats are now concluding, are an effort to circumvent the Senate and the Constitution.
As for this internet fabrication of Bush creating 45 positions (they were counting the number of appointments and not the positions created in an effort at disinformation, which the Communists used extensively in their efforts to promote their ideology), that is a lie that cannot be supported by the facts being put out by this Administration in a desperate effort to counter their own incompetence and inter-party criticisms of those unconstitutional efforts.
What is fascinating in all your arguments is that you seem to assert that if the previous guys did it, it must now be okay; how trite.
Socialist policies? Good lord you're just one big bucket of fear.
I am amused that asserting that Obama is a Socialist engaging in Socialist policies now somehow equates to fear.
How do you logically connect those two?
As for the interior department this was a long time in coming. The Inspector General of the Department Earl Devaney revealed many of these problems last year in his report.
It is amusing at best to suggest that a highly placed individual can be swayed by the payment of $159 in green fees. But what is equally farcical in Liberal logic is that even though he paid this fee back to the company who invited him, it is only good enough when people like Ron Kirk, Dashle, Nancy Killefer's or Tim Geithner don’t pay their taxes then ask for forgiveness and still are nominated for high posts, and in some cases, getting them.
I didn't realize doing blow on the job was legal there truth.
What part of lying under oath do you continue to NOT get? I guess it only counts if your are a Republican like Libby who didn’t even commit the crime he was investigated for and a “perceived crime for which the original perpetrator was already known before spending millions of taxpayers money in fruitless investigations.
In Clinton’s case, he really did engage in extremely bad behavior using bad judgment and then compounded it by admittedly lying under oath about it, to the American people and his wife and kid. It is amazing that you and so many other Liberals defend such behavior.
People at the interior department were consuming alcohol, doing drugs, and having sex with oil and gas company employees while on the job. Total ethical violations but yeah you brush it off.
Once again, these are “allegations” but I have yet to see anything of substance suggesting that this behavior is more an anomaly that is typical with HUGE organizations rather than the assertion that this was common and rampant behavior condoned by evil Republicans.
Carry on; your trite attempts to downplay real corruption by your guys while attempting to fabricate it for the opposition, particularly where none exists is fascinating.