• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Assad: US-led airstrikes not serious or efficient

katsung47

Banned
Joined
Mar 13, 2011
Messages
879
Reaction score
128
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Assad:US-led airstrikes not serious or efficient

By ZEINAKARAMDecember 3, 2014

BEIRUT (AP)— Syrian President Bashar Assad said in remarks published Wednesday thatU.S.-led airstrikes targeting Islamic State group militants in his country areneither serious nor efficient, claiming they have failed to produce anytangible results.

Assad: US-led airstrikes not serious or efficient

This may proves another article:

America Never Intended to Defeat The Islamic State (ISIS)
By Tony Cartalucci
Global Research,November 20, 2014

Considering the hysteria generated by ISIS’ alleged globalexploits, it should then be infinitely curious to readers who happen across USpolicymakers claiming that ISIS may pose a threat, but constitutes by far alesser threat than Iran or Syria – the two principle nations leading the realfight against ISIS and its international sponsors. Furthermore, US policymakersclaim there is no urgency to defeat ISIS, and it should instead be “contained.”Of course, this “containment” will be within states targeted by US-backedregime change – serving as a convenient agent of destruction, destabilization,and perhaps even regime change itself.
Image: A growingchorus among US policymakers and the Western media are claiming that ISIS posesa minimal threat even amid simaltaneous efforts to ratchet up public hysteria.The West also claims it is no longer necessary to “defeat” ISIS and it shouldinstead be “contained” – instead nations targeted for regime change by the US,allowed to continue fighting America’s enemies by proxy … or in other words,ISIS should continue serving as the West’s private mercenary army.
America Never Intended to Defeat The Islamic State (ISIS) | Global Research
 
Back
Top Bottom