- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Oh yeah, let's send this case to trial! Tons of credible evidence; more than enough to get a conviction. As sad as it is that so many sheisters have surfaced, to condenn Wilson, I can't help but laugh.
The broken record from the pro-Browners is, "I still have questions".
I have a question, too: Why is there so many people from the Michael Brown side of the issue being exposed as liars and, at best, non-credible?
So who is “Professor” Shawn Parcells? He’s not a professor, he’s not a doctor, and he’s not qualified to work unassisted on autopsies either, as CNN discovered. In fact, his interference in another case allowed a murderer to go free, and the college at which he claims adjunct status says they never hired him in that capacity. Is Shawn Parcells just a remarkable auto-didact, or “a very good con artist” as law enforcement considers him (via Chuck Lane)?
CNN: Michael Brown autopsy “expert” may be a fraud « Hot Air
The broken record from the pro-Browners is, "I still have questions".
I have a question, too: Why is there so many people from the Michael Brown side of the issue being exposed as liars and, at best, non-credible?