• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Homosexuality sinful and/or unnatural?

Is homosexuality wrong and/or unnatural?


  • Total voters
    128
What is hilarious about the insanity flowing through this thread. Everybody is stuck on "WHY" and totally disregard "WHAT ARE THE SOCIAL CONSQENCES" of homosexuality.

The questions related to fundamental causes of homosexuality has been whittled down to: WE DON'T KNOW!

Is it impossible to move on to EFFECT?

The problem is is That the cause will be misrepresented in the next thread about homosexuality. The effect of homosexuality is negligible except to increase the amount of good art and hairstyles in the the world.
 
The problem is is That the cause will be misrepresented in the next thread about homosexuality. The effect of homosexuality is negligible except to increase the amount of good art and hairstyles in the the world.

Another great diversion to the topic, Mac. Diversion has become an art form for some.
 
Would you elaborate on this?

Were the beasts created first?
GEN 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
GEN 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Or were men created first?
GEN 2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
GEN 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
 
Good art, mac?

We lost art when it mostly became modernized. I prefer classical Rembrandt, Picasso, Caravaggio, etc.

Now we have distasteful abstract messes on paper. It's beauty cannot compare to oil paintings like those by Jan van Eyck.
 
Last edited:
Another great diversion to the topic, Mac. Diversion has become an art form for some.

How is it a diversion? Is the effect of homosexuality the topic of this thread? How 'bout you focus a bit?
 
Good art, mac?

We lost art when it mostly became modernized. I prefer classical Remnant, Picasso, Caravaggio, etc.

Now we have distasteful abstract messes on paper. It's beauty cannot compare to oil paintings like those by Jan van Eyck.

i'd recommend you subscribe to art in America. Plenty of good art being created...and not all abstract either.
 
The causes can be sinful or unnatural....as well as the effects. Focus.....focus....

More diversion...more diversion. Stick with the topic.

Name me as sinful cause of homosexuality.
 
More diversion...more diversion. Stick with the topic.

Name me as sinful cause of homosexuality.

By the Christian perspective, Satan is the great deceiver/tempter.
 
Last edited:
Lust.


Sinful wasn't my word by the way, it was yours.

LUST...hahahaha! That is an effect of any sexual orientation. SIN and UNNATURAL are in the title of this thread, Mac. Focus, focus, focus.
 
By the Christian perspective, Satan is the great deceiver/tempter.

Wake... Satan is an invisible character out of a book. I don't see any evidence that the content of that book has scientific merit and doesn't explain empirical events and issues such as homosexuality.

Nowhere in the bible does it address "cause and effect" of homosexuality.
 
Wake... Satan is an invisible character out of a book. I don't see any evidence that the content of that book has scientific merit and doesn't explain empirical events and issues such as homosexuality.

Nowhere in the bible does it address "cause and effect" of homosexuality.

You don't understand God, Satan, etc. Because you do not understand Christianity, you will not understand discoursement stemming from religion.
 
LUST...hahahaha! That is an effect of any sexual orientation. SIN and UNNATURAL are in the title of this thread, Mac. Focus, focus, focus.

Doesn't make it not a sinful cause for homosexuality.....cone on man, try to keep up. ;)
 
Doesn't make it not a sinful cause for homosexuality.....cone on man, try to keep up. ;)

Your argument isn't working, Mac. It's circular at best. Just keep on doing what you are good at...diversion and making it up as you go along.
 
Your argument isn't working, Mac. It's circular at best. Just keep on doing what you are good at...diversion and making it up as you go along.

Lol, I'm not diverting anything.
 
Homosexuality is not wrong by worldly standards. Not much is.

Homosexuality is wrong by Christian standards. I'd not ignore over 10 verses about it.

It's honestly that simple.

See, I would be perfectly fine if people stuck purely to the religious argument. I completely disagree but at least it's an honest position to take. I hate it when people try to come up with other bull**** justifications for why homosexuality is wrong or why gay marriage shouldn't happen.
 
See, I would be perfectly fine if people stuck purely to the religious argument. I completely disagree but at least it's an honest position to take. I hate it when people try to come up with other bull**** justifications for why homosexuality is wrong or why gay marriage shouldn't happen.

I did not say there couldn't be any credible scientific arguments against it.

There are plausible evolutional arguments against homosexuality.
 
I did not say there couldn't be any credible scientific arguments against it.

There are plausible evolutional arguments against homosexuality.

I don't understand what you're trying to say. What precisely are "scientific arguments" and "evolutionary arguments" against homosexuality? Homosexuality denotes behavior that exists in real life. You can't have scientific arguments for or against it. That's about as silly as saying there are evolutionary and scientific arguments against taking cash out of the ATM. Scientific arguments aren't normative in nature.

And even if I do concede your point, none of them would explain why it's "wrong" or why gay marriage shouldn't be legal.
 
Last edited:
What is hilarious about the insanity flowing through this thread. Everybody is stuck on "WHY" and totally disregard "WHAT ARE THE SOCIAL CONSQENCES" of homosexuality.

The questions related to fundamental causes of homosexuality has been whittled down to: WE DON'T KNOW!

Is it impossible to move on to EFFECT?

Your turn. Please start a thread "What Are the Social Consequences of - " You want "Homosexuality" or "SSM"?
 
You don't understand God, Satan, etc. Because you do not understand Christianity, you will not understand discoursement stemming from religion.

Exactly. And since we're talking about law and not religion, your points have no business here.
 
Lol, I'm not diverting anything.

Deny, deny, deny...blame, blame, blame those, them, they, that. You can't even show any reasonable sources to back up your opinions...and that includes basic definitions.

By the way...LUST is indeed a behavior not a cause.

1. Intense or unrestrained sexual craving.

2.
a. An overwhelming desire or craving: a lust for power.
b. Intense eagerness or enthusiasm: a lust for life.

Why don't you start making some of your arguments credible by posting some sources that you derive your opinions from?

You might as well be throwing scripture at us. You kill any prospect of engaging in sensible debate by constantly shifting the argument by using a self-concocted rebuttal.

We all see your arguments but we don't have a clue as to where you get the information to make them...or to dispute others.

Every argument turns into another Mac Show. You bombard every topic with nothing by your personal beliefs...without injecting any viable information that might corroborate your views or position.

lust - definition of lust by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
 
Back
Top Bottom