• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Homosexuality sinful and/or unnatural?

Is homosexuality wrong and/or unnatural?


  • Total voters
    128
Because to some people it does. Not like people don't make threads to bash religion, politics etc.

Welcome to an internet web site for just such a thing. :doh

thanks for your meaningless post, it was very insightful <sarcasm> and I like how it addressed things I never mention and that are meaningless to my question. LMAO:lamo
 
And Jesus said there was a new covenant or Paul said there was a new covenant?

Read the Bible. I am not your Bible study teacher. Besides not like I have not explained this too you at least 2 times before.
 
thanks for your meaningless post, it was very insightful <sarcasm> and I like how it addressed things I never mention and that are meaningless to my question. LMAO:lamo

No sarcasm in my statement. Let's look at yours...

Im still waiting for someone to explain to me why it matters on this issue.

I answered with "Because to some people it does. Not like people don't make threads to bash religion, politics etc. Well looks like it is at least as meaningful as what you stated.

With the fact we are in America and the fact that the answers are 100% subjective its meaningless.
Statement, not a question.

The only goal by the OP is a failed attempt to bash homosexuality, problem is, the objective smart people wont let him and see right through it lol
More statements based on your opinion with no question as well.

It is exactly what you asked and far from meaningless.

Fact is you did not want an answer as your mind according to your statements is already made up.

I don't like talking to walls.
 
Last edited:
Again, I said heterosexuality and homosexuality. Either one could be as natural as the other, one could be natural and the other not as well. I'm not misleading anything here.

Besides, you have enough people here saying that homosexuality has been shown to be genetically caused. Period.....I've not seen any follow up from you about unclear language. The last time you told me my language wasn't clear as to whether or not I was expressing an opinion...the post led off with "in my opinion".....you're nit-picking me because I'm not following the party line.

I have been completely clear on the presentation on how I believe sexual orientation is caused, and say it often. That, alone, refutes anyone who makes a definitive claim around it being absolutely genetic. As far as your other post, I demonstrate my issues with that in the other thread.
 
No sarcasm in my statement. Let's look at yours...



I answered with "Because to some people it does. Not like people don't make threads to bash religion, politics etc. Well looks like it is at least as meaningful as what you stated.

Statement, not a question.

More statements based on your opinion with no question as well.

It is exactly what you asked and far from meaningless.

Fact is you did not want an answer as your mind according to your statements is already made up.

I don't like talking to walls.

wow LMAO i got to the very first line and I stopped there and laughed because when I wrote <sarcasm> I was in fact referring to ME hahahahah

as for the rest, it in fact had no barring on my questions or statement and contained meaningless points but again, thanks for your very insightful post<"I" AM BEING SARCASTIC>

WOW simply wow
 
Last edited:
wow LMAO i got to the very first line and I stopped there because when I wrote <sarcasm> I was in fact refferring to ME hahahahah

as for the rest, it infact had no barring on my questions or statment and contaniend meaninless points but again, thanks for your very insightful post<"I" AM BEING SACASTIC>

WOW simply wow

And you think this nonsensical reply means anything? I was pointing out how out of place your sarcasm was, it was silly at best. It means you got nothing but your opinion based on??? Nothing. I mean in reality they are like assholes and everyone has one.

You asked a question and I answered it. You don't like the answer and I am OK with that.
 
Last edited:
And you think this nonsensical reply means anything? It means you got nothing but your opinion based on??? Nothing. I mean in reality they are like assholes and everyone has one.

You asked a question and I answered it. You don't like the answer and I am OK with that.

if you say so, but the fact remains your answer was meaningless to my questions and statement and had no insight at all. It ranked right up there with "because I said so" or "I know you are but what am I" lol

seems you are still upset about some of our other meetings and decided to meaninglessly lash out at me, I find it VERY entertaining. You can play it cool and act like its because "I dont like the answer" but thats not it at all nor will it ever be. LOL Maybe you'll will get really upset again and personally message me crying again.

Its not my opinion its a fact that in AMERICA both answers are 100% subjective and there is no FACTUAL answer so I was wondering why the answer matters with THOSE two facts.

and you gave me the answer "because it does"

WHEW!!! that type of insight just takes my breath away LMAO
 
if you say so, but the fact remains your answer was meaningless to my questions and statement and had no insight at all. It ranked right up there with "because I said so" or "I know you are but what am I" lol

seems you are still upset about some of our other meetings and decided to meaninglessly lash out at me, I find it VERY entertaining. You can play it cool and act like its because "I dont like the answer" but thats not it at all nor will it ever be. LOL Maybe you'll will get really upset again and personally message me crying again.

Its not my opinion its a fact that in AMERICA both answers are 100% subjective and there is no FACTUAL answer so I was wondering why the answer matters with THOSE two facts.

and you gave me the answer "because it does"

WHEW!!! that type of insight just takes my breath away LMAO

Dude what is wrong with you? I honestly don't care.

You know the answer be it subjective or not. The fact you asked it, was just as stupid as this thread.

PS: you think this is lashing out?
 
Last edited:
Dude what is wrong with you? I honestly don't care.

LMAO yes its "me" that has the issue :D
why are you bothered that you responded to my post in a snarky fashion, I called you out on it and showed you your flaws in your response and how you actually didnt offer any insight and now you are emotional, defensive and lashing out?

LOL :shrug: you could always just not have respond to me, if you would have tried to honestly answer instead of what you did maybe this would have went differently? but im sure youll keep blaming it on me:cool:
 
So...What the score?

Homosexuality is sinful = ?

Homosexuality isn't sinful =?

Homosexuality is unnatural = ?

Homosexuality isn't unnatural =?
 
LMAO yes its "me" that has the issue :D
why are you bothered that you responded to my post in a snarky fashion, I called you out on it and showed you your flaws in your response and how you actually didnt offer any insight and now you are emotional, defensive and lashing out?

LOL :shrug: you could always just not have respond to me, if you would have tried to honestly answer instead of what you did maybe this would have went differently? but im sure youll keep blaming it on me:cool:

I did answer it honestly and you do know the answer already. You have already decided it is wrong and so details are irrelevant.

Yes it is you derailing, baiting and resorting to personal attacks, not me. Then you say I am emotional for some reason?
 
Moderator's Warning:
Centrist77 has been thread banned.
 
So...What the score?

Homosexuality is sinful = Yes

Homosexuality isn't sinful =?

Homosexuality is unnatural = No

Homosexuality isn't unnatural =?

No score, just opinion.
 
So...What the score?

Homosexuality is sinful = ?

Homosexuality isn't sinful =?

Homosexuality is unnatural = ?

Homosexuality isn't unnatural =?

HAHAH nice RM

answer is yes, yes, yes, and yes
but more importantly those answers only matter to oneself and his own, vary for everyone, and
any other correlation of them to law, pushing ones own morals, etc etc are meaningles in america
 
HAHAH nice RM

answer is yes, yes, yes, and yes
but more importantly those answers only matter to oneself and his own, vary for everyone, and
any other correlation of them to law, pushing ones own morals, etc etc are meaningles in america

I can agree with this but only to a point.

Fact: In America peoples morals do count for allot, like it or not. If this were not the case gay marriage would already be legal everywhere.

Meaningless? Not by a long shot.
 
I can agree with this but only to a point.

Fact: In America peoples morals do count for allot, like it or not. If this were not the case gay marriage would already be legal everywhere.

Meaningless? Not by a long shot.

It should be meaningless.
 
It should be meaningless.

No it shouldn't and was never intended to.

We elect government officials to represent us and our morals.

Our society should most certainly reflect our morals. Right or wrong is a different story.
 
No it shouldn't and was never intended to.

We elect government officials to represent us and our morals.

Our society should most certainly reflect our morals. Right or wrong is a different story.

Government laws should not be based on protecting people's freedom, and personal choice.
 
I can agree with this but only to a point.

Fact: In America peoples morals do count for allot, like it or not. If this were not the case gay marriage would already be legal everywhere.

Meaningless? Not by a long shot.

Your right to be moral ends at my anus.
 
No it shouldn't and was never intended to.

We elect government officials to represent us and our morals.

Our society should most certainly reflect our morals. Right or wrong is a different story.

Within the limits of the Constitution, which, due to the 14th Amendment, means that if there is any question of discrimination, the law needs to be reviewed as to why that discrimination exists and whether it is in fact protecting a legitimate state interest (at the proper level of scrutiny). SSM bans do not protect any state interest, nor can it be said that they do not deserve the right to marriage due to them not being able to procreate unless it could be shown that all marriage laws of any state or the US government that is claiming this is their reason for marriage are actually applying that limitation (procreation) to opposite sex couples. And they are discriminating against a group.
 
I'm still not sure I understand what the social impacts of gay marriage would be (aside from a religious/moral stance against homosexuality). Anybody able to break that down in maybe a list form.

Would a valid example be: Homosexuality is contagious?

Thanks...
 
I'm still not sure I understand what the social impacts of gay marriage would be (aside from a religious/moral stance against homosexuality). Anybody able to break that down in maybe a list form.

Would a valid example be: Homosexuality is contagious?

Thanks...

I believe an impact of SSM would be to strengthen the American family, and bring America closer to it's promise that all men are created equal.
 
Sin is subjective with no real basis in reality, or in the actual outcome of given "sinful" actions. Since there's no way to measure it, what's considered sinful is completely arbitrary. It doesn't relate to reality in any way. I don't think sin is even a valid concept. Asking whether or not being gay is a sin is a bit like asking if potatoes are happy or sad. It's that absurd.

As to whether it's natural, there's overwhelming evidence that it is. We see homosexual behavior and individuals in pretty much every mammal on earth. There is obviously an innate quality to homosexuality, since it results in physically observable and consistent traits. I don't even think it's in question, even if the exact mechanisms aren't fully understood.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom