Yes. It does. It means gay sex is unnatural.
Good thing you quoted.
Prove it. Let's see a definition WITH LINKS.
Are you kidding me? I've been asking all of you guys for proof, and all I get is that gay sex is natural because it says so in the dictionary.
YOU SHOW PROOF WITH LINKS.
OK, I will play: and if gay sex is unnatural, what does that mean? Why does it matter? What argument in favor of SSM does gay sex being unnatural undermine?
Well, since it IS unnatural, then SSM can't happen.
And all we've seen from you is gay sex is unnatural because it doesn't involve procreation, which is a bull**** argument with or without links, period.
Well, since it IS unnatural, then SSM can't happen.
In 2006, the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would prohibit states from recognizing same-sex marriages, was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a party-line vote and was debated by the full United States Senate, but was ultimately defeated in both houses of Congress.
No. The real BS argument is that it's natural because the dictionary says it is.
I don't understand how that's a BS argument. It's a hell of a lot better than your argument that "gay sex is unnatural, because it has nothing to do with procreation, because I say so."
No. The real BS argument is that it's natural because the dictionary says it is.
Are you kidding me? I've been asking all of you guys for proof, and all I get is that gay sex is natural because it says so in the dictionary.
YOU SHOW PROOF WITH LINKS.
i'm seriously at the end of my rope, honestly, who gives a **** if it's unnatural?
I'm more interested in people's take on why homosexuality is wrong.
Well, since it IS unnatural, then SSM can't happen.
Are you kidding me? I've been asking all of you guys for proof, and all I get is that gay sex is natural because it says so in the dictionary.
YOU SHOW PROOF WITH LINKS.
Well, since it IS unnatural, then SSM can't happen.
No. The real BS argument is that it's natural because the dictionary says it is.
I don't think it's natural either, but to be honest...whether it is or isn't is not a deciding factor on whether or not we'll make it legal. Basically, the nature of homosexuality is a moot point. So when someone says "it's natural....bonobo's do it"....it's irrelevant.