View Poll Results: If He does not follow the law, will you support a call for His impeachment?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    16 76.19%
  • No, because...

    5 23.81%
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 65

Thread: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

  1. #51
    Educator DemonMyst's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seattle WA.
    Last Seen
    02-11-13 @ 12:31 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    727

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by DashingAmerican View Post
    The perjury is that he lied under oath. If it was an unfair question he should have objected and refused to answer. That being said, IMO he shouldn't have been impeached.

    And actually in some states it is illegal to commit adultery, although it's not a federal law, just thought I'd throw that tid-bit out there.
    I never said he didn't commit perjury.. But he should have never been asked the question.. Yes.. He should have chosen not to answer.. I agree.. He shouldn't have been impeached..

    Who knows.. Had the republicans not been so obsessed with the presidents sex life.. We might have got Bin Laden during the Clinton administration and avoided 9/11 all together.. This is speculation of course.. But I thought I would throw that out there..

  2. #52
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Councilman View Post
    I doubt seriously the Radical Liberals in the Senate would never convict Obama ans a single charge would not be enough to oust him, however it might shut down some of his arrogance.


    Obama doesn't obey the the Constitution or the Laws on the books, let alone the War Powers Act.
    Didnt Dennis Kucinich call for his impeachment already?


  3. #53
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Yes i would...
    Why because its not our war and he is violating the law...


  4. #54
    Sage
    The Giant Noodle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Last Seen
    11-03-14 @ 05:39 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    7,333

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    More political BS from the GOP. This crap makes me sad on many levels.
    CORPORATE GREED AND UNION GREED
    DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS
    DESTROYING THE BEST OF AMERICA ONE DAY AT A TIME

    This is the worst kind of discrimination. The kind against ME! ~ Bender

  5. #55
    Guru
    Councilman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Riverside, County, CA.
    Last Seen
    11-04-11 @ 10:16 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,454
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Isn't it interesting that Liberals don't give a damn about the Constitution or the Nations laws if it's one of theirs who break them, but for the biggest part of 5 or 7 years they would carry signs showing President Bush as a monkey, Hitler, saying hang Bush.

    Someone asks a question about Obama clearly violating the War Powers Act and they are suddenly appalled at the question.

    The Liberals turn to hate and name calling, accusations of racism when the facts always show the Liberals are the ones behind the intolerance, the hate and the racism.

    Here is the definition of War: 1. a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation; warfare, as by land, sea, or air. 2. a state or period of armed hostility or active military operations.

    For Obama to claim this is not a war while we are bombing locations and killing people in another country is ludicrous. It's almost Like Clinton saying:
    "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."
    Clear as mud.





























    "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant Noodle View Post
    More political BS from the GOP. This crap makes me sad on many levels.

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Seen
    10-16-11 @ 03:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    1,845

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by DemonMyst View Post
    I never said he didn't commit perjury.
    Perjury is a felony. This is why he was impeached.

    But he should have never been asked the question
    In the context it was asked, the question was perfectly legitimate.
    Do you really thnk he would have answered it if he thought it was not?

    He shouldn't have been impeached.
    Perjury is a felony - a high crime and misdemeanor.

    Had the republicans not been so obsessed with the presidents sex life...
    This is a lie; Clinton was impeached for breaking the law.

  7. #57
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Catawba View Post
    Right on, and why didn't we go to as much trouble about questioning politicians for leading 4,000 of our soldiers to their deaths under false pretenses as we did about a blowjob?
    Maybe something called a lack of proof.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  8. #58
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    Didnt Dennis Kucinich call for his impeachment already?
    That guy is always on about something.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  9. #59
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Seen
    10-16-11 @ 03:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    1,845

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant Noodle View Post
    More political BS from the GOP. This crap makes me sad on many levels.
    Why would you not want to impeach a President who willingly and wantonly violates the WPA?

  10. #60
    Ideologically Impure
    Simon W. Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Fayettenam
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:02 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    16,981
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: If The Obama does not follow the War Powers Act

    Quote Originally Posted by PzKfW IVe View Post
    Why would you not want to impeach a President who willingly and wantonly violates the WPA?
    I don't think it's clear that Obama has "willingly and wantonly violate[d] the WPA." There are certain terms and phrases that are not defined and, most likely, have not been defined.
    I am quite willing for Congress or the Supreme court to take the case to establish those definitions. But as of yet, I would say that it's merely possible that such a violation has taken place.

    W/o knowing what exactly our guys are doing over there and w/o knowing what exactly certain phrases in the resolution mean, I don't think it can be determined. The info about what are guys are doing can prob'ly be found via the interwebz, but the interpretation of the phrases will take Congress of the SC.
    I may be wrong.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •