• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Daddy, Papa and Me: do you agree with?

Daddy, Papa and Me: do you agree with?

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 77.8%

  • No

    Votes: 4 22.2%

  • I dunno

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    18
Kids of homosexual parents do not get socialized to be gay, sexuality isn't a choice. This is a fact
 
xpiher said:
Kids of homosexual parents do not get socialized to be gay, sexuality isn't a choice. This is a fact
Click to expand...

Why else would any sane person choose to be gay in, say, Iran. It makes no sense.
 
Alfons, I think you could benefit from being friends with a nice person who is gay, or even a few. Then you'll see that a lot of the stuff you think about them is just silly.
 
Alfons said:
LOL,

a gay couple is better, are you joking?

Nice parents, aren't they?

syndey_gay_parade17.jpg
Click to expand...

Certainly no worse than this lovely couple and the two future welfare recipients they're raising.

whitetrashfamilyportrai.jpg


Seriously, you can find pictures of people who are unsuitable to be parents from all demographic groups. The fact is the studies have show children raised in stable gay couple households are significantly better off than children raised in foster homes. If you give even the slightest crap about kids, you'd want them raised in best available enviroment. Clearly adoption by a gay couple is superior to foster care.

Of course, I'm pretty sure your real objection has nothing to do with the welfare of children.
 
Last edited:
I think the OP needs to worry about his own lawn instead of poking his nose into his neighbor’s lawn.
 
Actually its statsitically proven that a heterosexual couple has a better chance of having a gay/lesbian child than a homosexual couple...
 
By the way Alfons i thought you were about small gov not big gov! Is it ok for the gov to nose in on your bedroom "activities" per say? Or the gov telling you want human is acceptable to marry?
 
Alfons just from your responses you strike me as the kind of person that talks about beating gays up if they ever hit on you which probably woulnt happen in the first place. You bring no logic to your points other than you seem to believe it's possible to catch gay.
 
Alfons said:
BTW what is about the acceptance of such children in schools or among those from straight families?
Click to expand...

How would you advocate these children be treated at school? You want them burned at a stake?

Alfons said:
Is it fine if a child instead of mom and dad has two dads while a big lot of politically correct secular humanists want to sell us such communities as a full normal "modern" families?
Moreover, it is very difficult to believe that children of such "families" will growing up as straight kids.Or maybe I am wrong, maybe only such families will exist in liberal politically correct future and all conservative families will be prohibited as "too hateful" per law.

Also, what do you think about, maybe somebody can additional explain how daddies and pappies will produce children, also, please vote and correct me, if I am wrong.
Click to expand...

I generally think you've been corrected many times when you start such threads but you don't like the evidence put against you and you either run away or start another one off.

Generally you're wrong - having a sexual attraction to the same sex exists in other life forms too, having a sexual attraction to the same sex is not something you can teach or catch and having two parents of the same sex does not mean you are a bad parent which is the important part to a child being brought up by same sex parents.
 
I'm against these kinds of things, but for a different reason than the standard person.
It comes from an experiment my wife and I, have done with our kids.

We originally agreed to this, to passively teach our kids to not recognize race as a defining characteristic.
We would not point out differences between, White, Black, Asian, what have you.
So far it has worked very well.
People are just people to my kids, they aren't White, Black, Asian, people but just people.

We've done the same for homosexual people as well.
My sister in law is gay, we have never made it a defining characteristic of her and my kids treat her and her partner, as their aunts, no questions asked.

I'd prefer that kids not learn about these things, as making them defining characteristics of people.
 
^ My son has been raised similarly. When very young kids play with each other, "race" is not an issue. They don't even have to speak the same mother tongue, they just play together.

"Race" is not real, it's an invention.
 
Temporal said:
^ My son has been raised similarly. When very young kids play with each other, "race" is not an issue. They don't even have to speak the same mother tongue, they just play together.

"Race" is not real, it's an invention.
Click to expand...

I think that to be a good example to kids, you shouldn't focus on arbitrary differences in people.
If you treat, gay and straight similarly, kids will mimic the adults and do the same.
Focusing to much on the differences is counter productive from my perspective.
 
spud_meister said:
Race is a biological concept, it is very real, the social constructs attached to it are invented, but race, in of itself is real.
Click to expand...

But it's just that no one seems very clear as to what they are. Here's a list. For each one, can you tell me whether it's a race, an ethnicity or something else?

Causasian
Jewish
Arab
Slav
Scot
African
Khoisan
Chinese
Hispanic
Turkic
Celt
Falasha
Aborigine
Koori

I'm not make any point, I'm just interested in the disparity between scientific definitions of race, cultural ones and popular (mis)conceptions. Phenotypical similarities and shared culture are the only criteria that we can use to make these distictions, aren't they? If so, and because the variations at the margins of each marker are so blurred, and increasingly so with more widespread migration patterns, there's little clarity to be had. If anyone's interested, perhaps I ought to take this onto a new thread.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Actually its statsitically proven that a heterosexual couple has a better chance of having a gay/lesbian child than a homosexual couple...
Click to expand...

The proofs please!
 
I'm entirely fine with that. Kids need parents, it doesn't really matter much what the gender of the parents happen to be, so long as it's a loving family.
 
kaya'08 said:
What's the point no amount of proof will change your mind. Whatever the good 'ol bible says.
Click to expand...

No proofs, no believe, the guy is wrong!
 
Cephus said:
I'm entirely fine with that. Kids need parents, it doesn't really matter much what the gender of the parents happen to be, so long as it's a loving family.
Click to expand...

It is difficult to believe that gay parents wish their child growing up as straight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom