- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
- Messages
- 1,993
- Reaction score
- 470
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
"Damn this Seperations of Powers bull ****"--The Kenyan Tyrant
The filibuster has nothing to do with separations of power...
"Damn this Seperations of Powers bull ****"--The Kenyan Tyrant
Considering our Forefathers and The Founders stood against pretty much everything Obama stands for..........
.........anything that stops the DNC agenda........is as patriotic as it gets.
.
.
.
Any and all criticism of Obama is........
..........but 98% of a race voting for their race........isnt.
.
.
.
.
Yeah, he's done a pretty good job so far. He promised us a moderate, and we got one. Hopefully he'll be a little more reckless in his second term. He's classy, intelligent, and seems honorable. I'm a bit more jaded than I was in 2008, but now we have real results to go with. He's done okay by me. Not perfect, but okay.
And especially since the alternative is republicans... Voting for Obama is easy when compared with his opponents.
Any and all criticism of Obama is........
..........but 98% of a race voting for their race........isnt.
what's wrong with not having children?
I don't trust people in positions of power-power sufficient to create precedents that live past them-who don't have children. having children is a rather significant brake on doing something really stupid for the ages
I don't trust people in positions of power-power sufficient to create precedents that live past them-who don't have children. having children is a rather significant brake on doing something really stupid for the ages
Historically not true.
Interesting take.
Personally I think both people who have children and people who don't are capable of making some really dumb decisions.
And for some people, having children is the dumbest one of all.
The filibuster has nothing to do with separations of power...
Oh do tell how you prove this
Thomas Jefferson founded the modern Democratic party.
Are you taking history lessons from Michele Bachmann or something?
The GOP would have to screw up colossally in the primaries for me to vote to re-elect President Obama. Of course, I am not likely to vote at all unless the GOP offers an outstanding candidate.
If only the candidates who have declared and/or formed exploratory committees so far are running, I would vote for Obama.As a Democrat, Liberal, Progressive, etc., if the election were to be held today, would you vote for President Obama?
I am on the fence at this point. He has done many good things, but he has also dissappointed me in grave ways as well.
What about you, my fellow bleeding heart? Will you vote for him?
Good, people like you will ensure Obama wins
Yeah, he's done a pretty good job so far. He promised us a moderate, and we got one. Hopefully he'll be a little more reckless in his second term. He's classy, intelligent, and seems honorable. I'm a bit more jaded than I was in 2008, but now we have real results to go with. He's done okay by me. Not perfect, but okay.
And especially since the alternative is republicans... Voting for Obama is easy when compared with his opponents.
Ps, Badmutha... what reality are you living in? Even when you're trying to make a point, you resort to inane, charged up language. There's no facts, just a lot of hot air. Do you have any real criticism, or do you just hate the man for reasons you can't quite explain?
Why should I care if he wins, if there isn't a better candidate in the race?
Can you give one example of his "Moderation"? The Kenyan Tyrant has never crossed the aisle......as Tyrant......or Senator.
Can you name a candidate who wouldnt be better than Obama--Worst President in History?
Can you name a candidate who wouldnt be better than Obama--Worst President in History?
.
.
.