• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who do you think will win the Republican nomination?

Who do you think will win the Republican nomination?


  • Total voters
    70
I think Romney is going to take it, but who knows, maybe a dark horse will emerge? It's sad to see so much "crazy" in the top list now.
 
The more GOP that jump into this race the more diluted and confusing the issues become. In the end too many candidates will damage each other and when it comes down to the two left standing in the primary there will be nothing left but to abuse each other.
The gop has so many hopefuls because they believe Obama has no chance of winning or there wouldnt be so many willing to waste political capitol on taking on a sitting president. The gop needs to be careful how much they attack each other
 
I would like to see Cain take the Republican nomination just to send the racists in our country overboard.

I'm buying into the buzz around Herman Cain.

You know, it'd be nice to assuage the last vestiges of my white liberal guilt, seeing as I didn't vote for the last black Presidential candidate.

Besides, I think he's the real deal. I don't like the Fair Tax and he's more pro-life than I'd care for, but I believe he could lead Congress into fixing the budget and everything he's said about foreign policy strikes me as measured and pragmatic.

Ron Paul-great message, lousy messenger

Opposite problem. He's phenomenal. He's everything I think of when I say "Presidential material". I'd vote for him twice if I agreed with him on a single damned thing.
 
Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Michelle Bachmann, Donald Trump, and Ron Paul will not win the GOP nomination. In fact, Palin and Bachmann aren't even formally running yet.

Newt Gingrich won't pass the conservative test because of his divorces and is reviled by liberals for his witch-hunt against Clinton, which means him getting the nomination will mean an instant loss for the GOP.

Donald Trump is a good businessman, so he would be good with regards to the economy, but he has absolutely no experience with governing, which is vastly different from directing a business. For example, a CEO doesn't have to deal with a legislature in order to enact policies. So he may actually try to extend executive authority. This is actually an issue that Florida governor Rick Scott is dealing with now.

Ron Paul, while a favorite of the Tea Party crowd, won't win the GOP nomination either. While people distrust the government, they also distrust mega-corps too. The government serves as a check against big businesses. I think that while people favor certain planks of his platform, they are uncomfortable with his platform as a whole. Therefore, he won't get the nomination either.

Mitt Romney would be able to attract moderate Republicans and moderate Independents and even conservatives Democrats. After all, he's a successful businessman and the economy is where President Obama is the weakest. He also has governor experience which makes him well suited to the Presidency. However, the fact that his Massachusetts health care plan was a model for the Democratic health care plan doesn't help him with the far-right, and neither does his changing attitudes concerning abortion. However, those stances are what makes him so favorable in the general election, but not the primary.

To be honest, I don't know much about Tim Pawlenty, John Huntsman, or Mitch Daniels. What little I've read up on them to make this post, it seems to me that John Huntsman is too unknown and possibly too centrist to win the primary.

Which means it'll likely come down between Tim Pawlenty and Mitch Daniels. Between those two, Mitch Daniels probably has the edge because of social issues. Daniels passed laws to make abortions more difficult to get and has reduced funding to Planned Parenthood. Tim Pawlenty, however, has focused more on economic issues.

So among all those options, it might be Mitch Daniels who is the most likely to get the nomination.
 
I predict Romney, unless Huckabee announces. Neither of them stand a chance in the general election though.

Actually, considering all the other GOP nominees, I think Romney has the best chance in the general election but the worst for the primary.
 
Actually, considering all the other GOP nominees, I think Romney has the best chance in the general election but the worst for the primary.

I dont think he has the worst chance but he certainly has less of a chance in the primary.
 
Who do you think will win the Republican nomination in 2012? (Not who you WANT to win.)

I voted for Romney, I think it would be a toss up between him and Huckabee though, if Huckabee runs.
 
Actually, considering all the other GOP nominees, I think Romney has the best chance in the general election but the worst for the primary.

polls indicate he is a front runner in the primary, and does worse then Paul and a couple others in a general election.

but now, I'm seeing that he bombed big time last night in his speech, so I'm changing my vote, I think he may well of blown it completely this time. It's going to be someone that has not formally announced - likely Huck.

Right recoils from Mitt Romney speech - Molly Ball - POLITICO.com
 
polls indicate he is a front runner in the primary, and does worse then Paul and a couple others in a general election.

but now, I'm seeing that he bombed big time last night in his speech, so I'm changing my vote, I think he may well of blown it completely this time. It's going to be someone that has not formally announced - likely Huck.

Right recoils from Mitt Romney speech - Molly Ball - POLITICO.com

I don't disagree with you. But note it says that the right-wing recoils from Romney - not moderates. Which is why I think he's going to have a harder time in the primary than he would in the general election.
 
I don't disagree with you. But note it says that the right-wing recoils from Romney - not moderates. Which is why I think he's going to have a harder time in the primary than he would in the general election.

but only because he foolishly doubled down on Romney-Care. If he took the approach Pawlenty took with cap and trade, and apologize for the mistake, he could remain the leading candidate in the GOP.
 
but only because he foolishly doubled down on Romney-Care. If he took the approach Pawlenty took with cap and trade, and apologize for the mistake, he could remain the leading candidate in the GOP.

Well, that depends on whether or not you think he made a mistake. Right-wingers might. Moderates and conservative Democrats might not.
 
Well, that depends on whether or not you think he made a mistake. Right-wingers might. Moderates and conservative Democrats might not.

moderates and conservative democrats picking the GOP candidate does not interest me in the slightest. I'm glad they have little voice in the republican primary, which is why romney's decision is a mistake
 
moderates and conservative democrats picking the GOP candidate does not interest me in the slightest. I'm glad they have little voice in the republican primary, which is why romney's decision is a mistake

What moderates and conservative Democrats think of the GOP candidate may not be important with regards to the GOP primary. But its awfully important with regards to the general election.
 
What moderates and conservative Democrats think of the GOP candidate may not be important with regards to the GOP primary. But its awfully important with regards to the general election.

Their voice in the primary just increases the chance to lose earlier, which I don't find all that important.
 
no herman cain on list :(

The OP probably works for the media.
They too leave Cain off the list and put people on that haven't even set up an Exploratory Committee.
Ron Paul and Newt just officially threw in their hats. They are getting covered.
Cain was the first to form an exploratory committee and will be throwing in his hat on the 21st of this month. Wonder if the media will even throw him a bone?
Anyway, I voted other. Cain just might have to win without any help from the media.
Oh yea, Fox News sucks. They just gave the "Rents to damn high!" guy air time. He said he's running.
 
The OP probably works for the media.
They too leave Cain off the list and put people on that haven't even set up an Exploratory Committee.
Ron Paul and Newt just officially threw in their hats. They are getting covered.
Cain was the first to form an exploratory committee and will be throwing in his hat on the 21st of this month. Wonder if the media will even throw him a bone?
Anyway, I voted other. Cain just might have to win without any help from the media.
Oh yea, Fox News sucks. They just gave the "Rents to damn high!" guy air time. He said he's running.

They used their crony Frank Luntz to try to pump up Cain to the country. I'm sure they will continue to do so in future debates.
 
Hermain Cain is the dark horse of the race I think, at first I was impressed, but he seems to just repeat a lot of Right wing rhetoric so he could get the nomination just based on that.

as for other contendors I really just can't say, Sarah and Trump probably won't run and Bachmann will be on the Yeah ****ing right she'll be elected ticket.

Gingrich too much baggage, Paul doesnt fire up the base, Romneys Health Care debacle destroys him... and the rest are just hopeless.

The GOP is gonna have a tough time this round, but you never know what could happen.
Seem the only polls Cain doesn't do well on are the ones that don't include him. I've seen a lot of polls where he wasn't included. Below are a few he was included in.

I'm starting to think people are afraid he will do well, and it's not because they don't think he's a serious contender.

2nd only to Christy. Guess that puts him at number one.

Zogby Cain takes second place

Herman Cain jumps to second among Republican candidates, according to Zogby poll - Yahoo! News

Washington State Cain wins

https://draftcain.wordpress.com/2011/05/10/herman-cain-wins-gop-straw-poll-in-washington-state/

Iowa... Cain has Big lead

BREAKING: New Iowa Poll Gives Herman Cain Double-Digit Lead But Iowans Unsure

Meet Herman Cain – see why he is topping GOP polls for 2012 : USACTION NEWS

Another interesting Poll Cain, 3rd only to Bacmann and Bolton (Gee didn't know Bolton was running)

NH Poll (5/2011) Ballot Tests « A Pollster On Polling

Takes 2nd, behind Palin (is she even running?)

http://citizens4cain.com/site/blog/...s-second-place-in-hot-air-april-primary-poll/
 
They used their crony Frank Luntz to try to pump up Cain to the country. I'm sure they will continue to do so in future debates.

Sure... that's why Fox has been ignoring Cain since then and immediately following, Sean Hannity was pumping up Santorum. Now Newt. For whatever reason Cain is not the favorite on Fox. That focus group was real, with real people. That's the affect Cain has on people when they hear him speak. Even though that wasn't even Cain at his best. (He seemed a bit nervous a couple times to me.) But, hey, pretty good for first time ever in a presidential debate. He'll do better next time.
 
Mit can't win because of Romneycare
Gingrich can't win because he lost in 1996-97
Paul can't win because he is a real conservative
Palin won't win because of people like me who will register republican just to vote against her
Bachmann won't win because she can't win a general election.

Mitch Daniels it is
 
The OP probably works for the media.
They too leave Cain off the list and put people on that haven't even set up an Exploratory Committee.

Ahem. There's only room for 10 poll options; I can't include everyone. So I listed the 9 candidates that had the best chance of winning according to InTrade as of last night, and also included an option for "other."

Is Herman Cain going to be the Ron Paul of this election cycle...the candidate with lots of annoying supporters on the internet and no real support among the electorate? It's starting to seem that way. :roll:
 
Last edited:
I would like to see Cain take the Republican nomination just to send the racists in our country overboard.

It would take the race card off the table, and the racist left would have to start playing the Uncle Tom/House Negro/Token card.
Oh, never mind...They are already playing it and he hasn't even won yet,
 
Oh, never mind...They are already playing it and he hasn't even won yet,

Proof? Also, he worked for the FED. Why do you support someone who is all about big gov control over the economy?
 
other than the danger of Sham wow appointing more childless statist- socialists to the USSC, this would work out well in furthering my ultimate goal of having my good friend win in 2016

Senator Rob Portman of Ohio-the guy the late great David Broder deemed the most likely GOP winner in 2016

Oh man, I don't know much about him, but when I heard him a couple times in 2010, I was very impressed.
 
Back
Top Bottom