• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What do you prefer after death?

What do you prefer after death?

  • Everlasting death

    Votes: 7 19.4%

  • Everlasting life in Hell

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • Everlasting life in Paradise

    Votes: 23 63.9%

  • No opinion

    Votes: 5 13.9%
  • Total voters
    36
Blackdog said:
What I really want after death is the ability to watch the living.... In the shower mostly.
Click to expand...

Will they change your name to Horndog? :mrgreen:
 
StillBallin75 said:
God is omnipotent. He doesn't need to delegate such powers. He'll probably just let the tip of his pinky finger do the work.
Click to expand...

God is omnipotent, but lazy. Don't you dare judge him, foolish mortal.
 
Last edited:
X Factor said:
Serious answer: to spend eternity with my Savior.

Not so serious answer: paradise would be a year round football season. All the dead greats could play. Every game would be like fantasy football.
Click to expand...

And John Madden suddenly becomes great at commentary.
 
Catz Part Deux said:
Quarks. He's the music of the spheres; the tie that binds.
Click to expand...

No, no, no. He created Quarks. What part of "Omnipotent and pinkie finger" are you missing? Not that you are missing a pinkie finger... I think? Do you have Hamsters?
 
Blackdog said:
No, no, no. He created Quarks. What part of "Omnipotent and pinkie finger" are you missing? Not that you are missing a pinkie finger... I think? Do you have Hamsters?
Click to expand...

Well, if you're going to be all specific, He isn't a he.
 
Catz Part Deux said:
Well, if you're going to be all specific, He isn't a he.
Click to expand...

Blasphemer! How dare you go against all that is manly and manful.

Why do you think at the end of a prayer we say...

Ahhhhh Mennnnnn!

Coincidence? I think not!

Now answer my question! DO you or not own a small mammal known as a Hamster!

PS god created MAN in his OWN image. Women are just a byproduct of that manufacturing process. Like aluminum and fluoride.
 
Last edited:
jamesrage said:
If I had the choice I think I would want to just keep being reincarnated as a human over and over again.
Click to expand...

There are not proofs for any reincarnation, however too much for afterlife and existence for Hell and Paradise.
 
ADG said:
As far as I know, I am worm food when I die, but if I were to prefer a future it would be in paradise.
Click to expand...

Here is the Kee of Paradise!
You can take it!

holy-bible-kjv.jpg
 
lpast said:
Theres only one choice for me..Everlasting paradise, why would anyone choose anything else ?
Click to expand...

You got the point, interesting why liberal secular humanist prefer to became worm food and everlasting death instead of to life with celestial body in heaven.
 
liblady said:
surely you understand that none of that is proof.
Click to expand...

There are thousands times more proofs for existence of God, Afterlife, Hell and Paradise as for failures Darwin's Theory and Atheistic Doctrines.
 
Alfons said:
There are thousands times more proofs for existence of God, Afterlife, Hell and Paradise as for failures Darwin's Theory and Atheistic Doctrines.
Click to expand...


What empirical testable "proofs" are these you speak of?
 
Alfons said:
There are thousands times more proofs for existence of God, Afterlife, Hell and Paradise as for failures Darwin's Theory and Atheistic Doctrines.
Click to expand...

c'mon, alfons, i believe in a god, and i believe, possibly, in an afterlife. thank goodness i DON'T need proof, because there is none. that's why it's called faith. certainly there is anecdotal evidence, but science cannot prove the existenace of god, and neither can you. if your faith is strong, why do you care what others believe?
 
liblady said:
nothing wrong with conservative christians, as long as they really are christians. too many are NOT.
Click to expand...

You are right, even conservative Christians can not be true Christians unless they follow the Teaching of Holy Bible.
 
liblady said:
c'mon, alfons, i believe in a god, and i believe, possibly, in an afterlife. thank goodness i DON'T need proof, because there is none. that's why it's called faith. certainly there is anecdotal evidence, but science cannot prove the existenace of god, and neither can you. if your faith is strong, why do you care what others believe?
Click to expand...

Be careful with discussion and mocking about God!

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom