Simple enough question.
Simple enough question.
The road to Hell and the road to Jahannam is the same damn road.
I became a conservative by being around liberals. I became a libertarian by being around conservatives. ~ Greg Gutfeld.
A man who compromises freedom for security deserves neither.
I don't need a bloated, inept bureaucracy to do things for me. I just need them to stay out of my way.
It may be a simple question, but the answer isn't so simple. Protecting freedoms and security go hand in hand. Government's primary job is to do both within a balance that maximizes both.
Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
The government is supposed to do both, but in practical terms there is a tradeoff. More of one usually comes at the expense of the other. The trick is to find a healthy balance that optimizes both.
- Colonel Paul YinglingNobody who wins a war indulges in a bifurcated definition of victory. War is a political act; victory and defeat have meaning only in political terms. A country incapable of achieving its political objectives at an acceptable cost is losing the war, regardless of battlefield events.
Bifurcating victory (e.g. winning militarily, losing politically) is a useful salve for defeated armies. The "stab in the back" narrative helped take the sting out of failure for German generals after WWI and their American counterparts after Vietnam.
All the same, it's nonsense. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, show me a political loser, and I'll show you a loser.
The main purpose of government is to protect and proliferate our rights and liberties. Security, of course, is part of that. There is some amount of government force necessary to ensure the free exercise of our rights and guarantee the blessings of liberty to our posterity. Security should not come at the cost of our rights, however. We have to understand that on some level, free has never been and never will be safe. There are reasonable steps to take to ensure the exercise of our rights; but if we tread too far we will not be anymore "secure", but we will certainly be less free.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
the governments PRIMARY job, is to protect freedoms... all security you need is already included in that, like anything that violates your liberty is subjected to be protected by the government because it violates your freedom.
The government's job is to protect both. And it's a difficult job because protecting one often compromises the other.
If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.
If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
I personally think its the role of government to stop gays from getting married...
Helps me sleep at night.