repeter
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 3,445
- Reaction score
- 682
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I took both. my Econ was pretty basic; supply demand curve, what goes into GDP, etc. In my Poli Sci class I learned about federalism and the social contract. I also learned that Republicans wanted to control our personal lives, that our Republican Governor was anti-education, that George Bush was too stupid to be president, and that moving into a "living Constitution" society marked by a large and generous federal government was the logical conclusion of the Founders intent.
I think thats more of a teacher's touch and personal opinion. I took government last semester this year, and economics this semester. My teacher is pretty conservative, but he's a really good teacher, and only pokes fun at history from his perspective. My government class didn't teach a whole lot, it basically went over the way government is set up, how power is divided, the principles behind the various Founding Fathers, nothing too intense. I don't even know which type of economics I'm learning (it never even mentions Keynes, or any other notable economist and/or major schools of thinking), its just supply and demand like your class. Though it has a bit more emphasis on government regulation than free-market ideology, from what I can tell.
So...I guess the point of all that was that it depends on the teacher. I'd say you had a bad teacher who couldn't seperate the facts from his opinion and ideology.