• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are Gay People "Abnormal"?

Are gay people "abnormal"?


  • Total voters
    91
IT IS NECESSARY, tell me ONE species that is majority homosexual and survives?
p.s.- there are some animals that only have one gender so it doesnt count.

It isn't necessary because gay people can still reproduce.
 
It isn't necessary because gay people can still reproduce.

...through being temporarily straight. Hence not being true to their supposed self-declared lifestyle.
 
...through being temporarily straight. Hence not being true to their supposed self-declared lifestyle.


Or they can just use a turkey baster.
 
...through being temporarily straight. Hence not being true to their supposed self-declared lifestyle.

No, they're not being "temporarily straight" because they're not attracted to people of the opposite sex. They're having heterosexual sex as homosexual people. How does this prove that heterosexuality is necessary.
 
Or they can just use a turkey baster.

Humor, you.

It's still being temporarily straight. We know homosexuals cannot reproduce, so they mix sperm with egg through mechanical means. It's still "straight" in terms of the method.
 
No, they're not being "temporarily straight" because they're not attracted to people of the opposite sex. They're having heterosexual sex as homosexual people. How does this prove that heterosexuality is necessary.

Because that's not homosexual. Homosexuals have homosexual sex. Heterosexuals have heterosexual sex.

It's not what nature intended; it's what we humans can do, so we do so.
 
Or they can just use a turkey baster.

Originally Posted by Wake
...through being temporarily straight. Hence not being true to their supposed self-declared lifestyle.

I've heard it has been done, second hand news. Not sure if it was gay thieft or Genetic thieft.

Oral, plastic bag, baste well.
 
Because that's not homosexual. Homosexuals have homosexual sex. Heterosexuals have heterosexual sex.

It's not what nature intended; it's what we humans can do, so we do so.

Homosexual sex, heterosexual sex.

So if a heterosexual couple has anal sex what would you call that?
 
Because that's not homosexual. Homosexuals have homosexual sex. Heterosexuals have heterosexual sex.

It's not what nature intended; it's what we humans can do, so we do so.

Intended? How do you know that nature has intentions?
 
Because that's not homosexual. Homosexuals have homosexual sex. Heterosexuals have heterosexual sex.

It's not what nature intended; it's what we humans can do, so we do so.

That is a hard hitting point you have there. And the wheels on the buss go round and round.

Back to square one, gay cannot reproduce.
 
...through being temporarily straight. Hence not being true to their supposed self-declared lifestyle.

Gay and strait are "states of being". They are terms to describe an aspect of a person. Hetero and homo sex are actions. They are different things. You can be 100 % gay, and engage in heterosexual sex. You are not becoming temporarily strait, you are simply engaging in an act.
 
That is a hard hitting point you have there. And the wheels on the buss go round and round.

Back to square one, gay cannot reproduce.

Gays do reproduce. Not only can they, they frequently do.
 
Homosexual sex, heterosexual sex.

So if a heterosexual couple has anal sex what would you call that?

That makes me nervous on so many levels. :shock: :3oops:
 
Gay and strait are "states of being". They are terms to describe an aspect of a person. Hetero and homo sex are actions. They are different things. You can be 100 % gay, and engage in heterosexual sex. You are not becoming temporarily strait, you are simply engaging in an act.

I'm skeptical of this. The only exception to a person being straight yet engaing in homosexual sex is if said person were raped in prison, etc. I don't believe they are "states of being", but life-style choices based on every single influence they have experienced. Much like behaviorism, in a way. In response to your 2nd to last sentence, does that nullify the term "bisexual"?
 
That makes me nervous on so many levels. :shock: :3oops:

I'd deem it perverse based on my religious views.

From an evolutional standpoint, I would say nature doesn't intend for that to happen.
 
Last edited:
I'm skeptical of this. The only exception to a person being straight yet engaing in homosexual sex is if said person were raped in prison, etc. I don't believe they are "states of being", but life-style choices based on every single influence they have experienced. Much like behaviorism, in a way. In response to your 2nd to last sentence, does that nullify the term "bisexual"?

That's not true. There are straight people who do gay porn for money. Also, if you consider anal sex "gay sex" then a lot of straight people do that as well.
 
Not if you use lube.

You do not know all you think you do. I imagine being a dedicated lesbian has it's drawbacks on personal knowledge.

You really cant say it works 110% of the time, even when a woman likes it.
 
That's not true. There are straight people who do gay porn for money. Also, if you consider anal sex "gay sex" then a lot of straight people do that as well.

I would deem it perverse, as well. In general sex for money is against my morals. If both partners are of the same sex, then it's a perversion in my eys. If partners of the opposite sex do it, it's a perversion in my eyes.

I cling to traditional morality.
 
You do not know all you think you do. I imagine being a dedicated lesbian has it's drawbacks on personal knowledge.

You really cant say it works 110% of the time, even when a woman likes it.

I'm offended, you assume I don't know anything about anal sex. (This is what liberals get offended about)
 
Back
Top Bottom