“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump
Please describe in detail the difference between an innate response and a compulsive response, then please tell me why compulsive disorders are not simply normal innate responses.No, that is inaccurate. Liking or not liking something, at it's essence is an unconscious impulse. The secondary rationalizations and realizations may be responses to learned behaviors/ideas, but the initial impulse is innate and not something you can control.
redacted.This is accurate.
Nor have you or anyone been able to prove that orientation other than normal is anything other than a choice. I fully admit and understand that I am not a clinical or reserach pshycologist...however, not legitimate clinical or research psychologist (or any other Dr.) has been able to prove it beyond "it may be the result of"This does not fall into the morality piece that we are discussing in the other thread. This is not an opinon, but something factual/logical. You have still never been able to prove that either orientation is not a choice and you have been unable to demonstrate any difference between the feelings that one has between the two orientations. Unless you can demonstrate that the process of emotional attachment is different for gays than it is for straights, your opinion on this matter valueless since it has no substantiation and is not logical.
No you're not, except perhaps you're right that agreeing to your perspective would sink my argument. The problem is, I don't agree with your perspective. If you weren't so convinced in your own perspective, you'd see that difference.Nope. I'm right on target.
Nor have you, I'm afraid it boils down to a difference of opinion. You know full well you can not prove that orientation is anything other than choice, just like I can't prove it is.You can disagree all you like, but it doesn't change the fact that you cannot and have not proven your position. An individual's emotions are innate and not chosen. The response to these emotions can be chosen and altered. This is the issue that you are arguing against and you have been unable to prove that it is incorrect.
sexually immature men and those with lower IQ's tend to go for women with big racks. more sophisticated and intellectual men prefer lithe figures. big boobed women tend to get strong but dumb men.
women built like ballerinas tend to get smart clever mates