as if
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2011
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 10
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
We have more then enough people on this planet.
Thats quite alright, in fact, its a crisis.
Two very good points
We have more then enough people on this planet.
Thats quite alright, in fact, its a crisis.
What is normal about being homosexual. Its normal for humans to have children. Two men or two women cannot copulate and have a child. My conclusion is that homosexuslity is not normal. In fact it is an aberration to be a homosexual. I recomend converting to heterosexuality. Do your part to propagate our species.
There is no eggs in the ass.
Irrelevant. Procreation and sexual orientation are two different things.
Kind of a dumb point. In order to figure out which is the normal route, you have to figure out which was designed into the system to have purpose. Frankly, this entire debate is dumb. Obviously there is nothing correct about having sex with your own gender or otherwise it would do something. I'm not saying it shouldn't be accepted or not, but damn, just shut up and admit what is what.
Oh and normal=/= natural. If you guys would realize that, it would be great.
Yes, I consider being gay to be abnormal. Heterosexuality is the norm, and homosexuality deviates from it, and is therefor abnormal. This is in no way a bad thing though.
Yes, I consider being gay to be abnormal. Heterosexuality is the norm, and homosexuality deviates from it, and is therefor abnormal. This is in no way a bad thing though.
[video=youtube;_6FBfAQ-NDE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6FBfAQ-NDE[/video
Good point, one I will no doubt be making in the future. For some errant reason those who cannot "get enough" believe the rest of the world should be the same or condon thier behavior.
Back when the agenda goups made so many claims I didnt listen to much. If I heard this means that this one's gay, or whaterer, I shruged it off. Good Golly Molly, if depeche mode is not gay I'll eat... something. He is even singing gayer for the song. spits ! ... and the wheels on the buss go round and round
One could argue that everyone does something abnormal, or is in some way abnormal, hence abnormality is the norm.
That is a position that I find intolerable and to be a complete cop-out. There are clear 'right' and 'wrongs' in society and this progressive position that is being pushed by you and others is disgusting.
Right and wrong are completely subjective,
Where do you get your numbers from?
There is plenty of data to indicate a nurture link to homosexuality but none to link nature to it.
Right and wrong are completely subjective, however, two things that aren't subjective are the facts that homosexuality is abnormal , and that everyone is abnormal in some way, therefore, the logical conclusion from that is that while something may be abnormal in of itself, being abnormal is completely normal.
Kind of a dumb point. In order to figure out which is the normal route, you have to figure out which was designed into the system to have purpose. Frankly, this entire debate is dumb. Obviously there is nothing correct about having sex with your own gender or otherwise it would do something. I'm not saying it shouldn't be accepted or not, but damn, just shut up and admit what is what.
Oh and normal=/= natural. If you guys would realize that, it would be great.
LOL no, but some do have to note to others that they are gay... when they note they are gay why do they if not to signify sexuality?
This is the reason I detest at times having to refer to me or most people, the term straight. From what I hear they are a small minority though one would not know it.
I'm digging for my 1970's hard copy dictionary now... I find I need to see if straight means anything in regard to sexuality... along with gay.
This was a research paper I did on the genetics of homosexuality using identical twins for the database. Identical twins have identical DNA ergo if one is homosexual and it is genetic then the other must also be. The research indicates, fairly conclusively, that there is no genetic link to homosexuality.. There is plenty of data to indicate a nurture link to homosexuality but none to link nature to it.
That is not a research paper, it is an op/ed. Further, it sources Cameron, who is entirely discredited. Lastly, the numbers you cite for homosexuality come from a twins study, not from general population, and I can find no corroboration of that study.
I can only assume that you did not read the paper.
Actually, completely on target point. Let me know what you have spoken to the designer and he has indicated specifically what each part was designed to do. You can link me to his site, too. Further, I would hope that you understand that procreation has nothing to do with sexual orientation... but from your post, that does not seen the case.
And if you guys would actually come up with an accurate and legitimate definition of EITHER, THAT would be great.