Not only are they anti-women, they are also anti-family, in my opinion. Planned Parenthood deals with many issues around woman health.I say no. People who want PP defunded believe so not because they are anti-women, but pro-children.
Not only are they anti-women, they are also anti-family, in my opinion. Planned Parenthood deals with many issues around woman health.
Not only are they anti-women, they are also anti-family, in my opinion. Planned Parenthood deals with many issues around woman health.
Women who want abortions, pay PP for them, the government doesn't fund the. See the Hyde amendment!It's not anti-women to want to defund PP. It's because I support womens' rights that I want to see them born. The federal government should defund every organization that provides for abortions. There are other places people can go if they need contraception or crisis pregnancy care.
I keep hearing how the act of defunding PP is anti-women. Do you believe this is true?
I support universal healthcare. However it is wrong to say that those who don't support it don't care about the health of born individuals. That is a fallacious argument.I find people amusing who only care about the health of people before they are born. They tend to be the same people who want to cut the health programs for those that have already been born.
Women who want abortions, pay PP for them, the government doesn't fund the. See the Hyde amendment!
Does your health insurance company (or corporate umbrella) also provide money for abortions?The government funds PP who uses those funds in other areas. It keeps them operating, and it keeps them able to preform abortions.
Does your health insurance company (or corporate umbrella) also provide money for abortions?
No they aren't "anti-women" Im not even sure what that term means, but they may selective in their standards and a little paranoid. By selective i mean the fact that no federal funds go to PP's abortion operations, although a common argument is that while they don't fund it directly they do free up more of PP's funds which potentially, and undoubtably are sometimes, used for abortions. But you could use that same argument for literally ANYTHING, heck lets say there's a female employee at Boeing who wants to get an abortion, the gov't contracts Boeing to make a new plane, Boeing pays the employee, woman gets an abortion!! Its indirect payment but the money ultimately came from the gov't.
Not so at all. If they only did "women's health issues" and not abortion, I wouldn't care the slightest. You know the problem is the controversial abortion part of PP. Don't pretend that everyone who wants to defund PP wants women to get cervical cancer. That's just stupid.
Not only are they anti-women, they are also anti-family, in my opinion. Planned Parenthood deals with many issues around woman health.
I keep hearing how the act of defunding PP is anti-women. Do you believe this is true?
Or you could compare it to a charity organization that feeds and shelters the homeless in America but also sends money to a terrorist organization.
It's not anti-women to want to defund PP. It's because I support womens' rights that I want to see them born. The federal government should defund every organization that provides for abortions. There are other places people can go if they need contraception or crisis pregnancy care.
I believe abortions are anti-family as it kills an unborn family member. Contraception ends at conception, and unplanned pregnancy doesn't justify an abortion even if contraception fails. A woman can go other places to receive healthcare. Many things like mammograms and other "services" of PP are not preformed there and merely refer women other places.
Ya except its entirely not like that at all, because unlike your example the money the gov't gives to PP doesn't go towards abortions. Let me give you another example, women wants abortion, gets a tax rebate, gets her abortion anyway, like she would have if she had gotten no rebates, but the rebate "freed up money for it." Tax rebates cause abortions.
Just like PP, they are going to provide abortions anyway, and while I agree the federal funds for other things "free up" funds for abortion services unless you can prove that if their federal funding was cut off they would decrease abortion services before any other you don't have an argument. Or to use your example, if we were sending money to a group which feed homeless and funded terrorists, and we cut off their funding, if they choose to just not feed as many homeless we haven't accomplished anything at all, in fact we've created a worse situation.
I keep hearing how the act of defunding PP is anti-women. Do you believe this is true?
No, but I think they are misguided to exactly what PP does. Yes they provide abortion services, but that is only 3% of their services, and they provide many great services to poor, and under-privileged women.