• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would the world would be better off without religion?

Do you believe the world be better off without religion?

  • Total voters
    44
Bruce said:
Where in that sentence does it say they didn't feed 'cause of their religious beliefs? The judge ruled they're not allowed to do that, but I'm yet to see any evidence that it's happened.
Click to expand...

Because a judge is going to rule that they can't do that out of the blue. Sure. Judges have nothing better to do than rule on things that don't happen.
 
Cephus said:
Because a judge is going to rule that they can't do that out of the blue. Sure. Judges have nothing better to do than rule on things that don't happen.
Click to expand...

Well then provide the situation that caused the judge to rule thus, if the judge didn't just rule out of the blue, then there should be a case of it happening.
 
Cephus said:
They also refuse to feed people who don't profess religious beliefs and you have to pray with them to get a bed for the night. They're a really poor example of a positive religious influence.
Click to expand...

Gotta link for that?

Let's say that you're correct. How many hundreds of millions of people have been helped by the Salvation Army vs. people they've refused to help? Do know that the Salvation Army is in Japan, as we speak? Alotta Buhdists in Japan.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom