I would tend to think such a candidate was too stupid and dishonest to elect.
Indeed, just like when this candidate promises to close Club Git'Mo within a year, and 3 years later not only is it still open, not only has this candidate supported holding certain prisoners indefinitely without ever charging them, but plans to keep doing so into the foreseeable future.
Its quite interesting how this thread is turning out. So many people demand transparency from our government and the President and yet when given the opportunity they are filled with suspician and think the person is "nutz" as MaggieD put it.
You can support government transparency without supporting stunts that diminish the authority of the office of the president. Far from allowing the public an uncensored glimpse of the White House, it would cause the president and the White House staff to censor themselves for fear of doing something stupid, or making an outside-the-box or un-PC suggestion that didn't play well on cable news.
Are you coming to bed?
I can't. This is important. What?
Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD