- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 36,235
- Reaction score
- 8,380
- Location
- Georgia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
That's what Truth Detector used to say. After he blatantly fabricated arguments from quotes that in no way supported what he claimed. Try again.
I did not fabricate anything. Please point out something I fabricated. You keep wanting to ignore your own posts. And the point I came in.
And your argument was awful. I see you are pretending that I never made the subject about literal creationism despite saying so. I find it hilarious you claimed I never said anything about YEC after you quoted me specifically discussing literal creationism.
Please point out how my "argument" was awful? Then you go off on some tangent that has nothing to do with my direct comment.
I am not pretending anything. I came in late and responded to you saying...
But that would result in him no longer being a creationist. Creationism only survives in education, fact free zones. Educating oneself results in a creationist no longer being a creationist, or a creationist who knows their belief is wrong, but is purely in it to milk the money from his former ilk. Doctor Snelling for example. Who has submitted real geology papers while moon lighting as a fake creationist for the paycheck.
Ikari's statement was about evolution and abiogenesis, not YEC. Your comment makes no mention of it. I responded going by the ACTUAL definition of the word...
Not true.
Being confused about the difference between abiogenesis and evolution has nothing at all to do with "him no longer being a creationist." I am a creationist and yet evolution is a fact. It has not changed my view or rocked the foundations of my faith. Now details about certain aspects of evolution are questionable, but in the end for the most part it is supported by good evidence.
Your post is mainly baiting, blanket statements and misinformation.
My comment was about being a creationist not rocking the foundations of the faithful.
Then you went of the reservation.
My second responce to you was to this...
But we cannot ignore the fact that some religious people are. And some are truly retarded. This one creationist I met (a few others tangled with him) argued that the flood and Genesis was literally true. When confronted with the issue of the geological record not sorting species by mass and shape, he basically argued that water doesn't sort by mass and shape. Except that you can test this. In your sink. A 5 lb dinosaur should end up on average, at a higher strata then a woolly mammoth. They don't. Ever. The problem with some evolution deniers is that they basically have a belief that requires their God to be a greatest deceiver of all time.
To which I responded...
So because one person is stupid, we must not ignore this fact and judge all people on the basis that some people are stupid? OK. Your logic makes perfect sense. :doh
Notice how none of my responses had anything at all to do with YEC directly? You made a fallacy argument and I pointed that out with the correct definition.
Still waiting for your apology.
OK. I am sorry my comments made yours look dumb. :lol:
Have fun blackdog!
I am.
Indeed. It doesn't. You were absolutely, 100% WRONG. Thanks for admitting it!
Uh why do you lie?
Indeed! You claimed I said nothing about YEC after you quoting me specifically discussing YEC. You clearly descended into typical knee jerk reaction as you demonstrated clear lack of facts.
Please feel free to point out where I did this? :lol:
Glad we can agree you screwed up.
Well more personal attacks. Have you no argument at all?