• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do You Agree with this definition of "Corporate Media?"

Do You Agree with this definition of "Corporate Media?"


  • Total voters
    5

pbrauer

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
25,394
Reaction score
7,208
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
See definition below.

Corporate Media - A term invented in the early 2000's by people in the liberal/progressive movement as a measure to stop or slow down the publics increasing awareness of the liberal bias that exists in our main stream news media. Proponents point out how media outlets are owned by big corporations and therefore in their view, it's only logical to conclude:
1) Those corporations strongly influence what stories are presented, and how they're presented to the public, based on their own corporate interests.
2) Since the people who sit on the boards of these big corporations tend to either vote or support republican economic policies, therefore the influence they exert must create a conservative biased media, rather than a liberal one.​
Based on those conclusions, proponents assert that not only is there no such thing as liberal bias in the media, but corporate influences have actually created a media that embraces a conservative bias. The "Corporate media" strategy, is to use the logical arguments they concocted, in order to convince people that not only is there no liberal bias in the media, but that liberal media bias couldn't possibly exist in the first place.

The idea is to convince as many people as they can, to stop believing the liberal bias they see with their own eyes and hear with their own ears, and instead accept their logic that it really doesn't exist because the media is owned by corporations.

The lengths some will go to prop up their political beliefs... lol
 
I disagree. News is there to make money and the more sensationalist the story, the better.
 
Sadly agree.
We do have both liberal and conservative slanted "news" - if one cares to call it "news".
We have no direct counter(that I know of) to Rush/Beck.
But the conservatives have little to counter NPR/PBS..IMO, this news is much more truthful, its no wonder the tea-bagging conservatives wish to cut spending here...
And its little wonder that the more advanced European nations use "government news"...
A treat , watch German news on TV ( a public channel)....its on a digital channel..
 
No.

First the term "corporate media" has been around longer than the early 2000's. (god i can't believe I just said that..i feel old :p )

Second it is a definition slanted heavily to make liberals sound bad and conservatives as the good guys when both are equally as bad or good as the other.

Third the news media is about profits and influencing people to whatever cause they happen to care about the most at that current time.
 
Back
Top Bottom