- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 27,101
- Reaction score
- 12,359
- Location
- Granada, España
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Agree. Bleeding hearts wish to whine and cry that it is not a deterrent due to all these lame ass studies but the fact is that we have not used Capital Punishment in the way that we should be so no study in the USA world can speak about things we are not doing.
I am pretty sure that if we started killing these monsters and sending a clear message to anybody living in the U.S.A.: if you kill someone in cold blood for no reason we can and will kill you in a speedy fashion? The lower than **** asswipes doing these things will stop and re-think their actions.
I am also 100% sure that if we started killing these little prick assholes that rape babies and small children that these digusting monsters would re-think what they do.
If we send a clear message that if you do this in this country you will DIE? You damn sure bet your ass it will go down. Period. Point. Blank.
Well, I'd argue that there is plenty of evidence from the US and from other countries that the DP does not function as a deterrent. If you believe that it has never been applied in the way you would envisage, then where do you get any evidence to support your assertion that it WOULD act a a deterrent. Do you just feel that it would? Please provide research links, if you have any.
I notice that most pro-DP posters seems to enjoy labelling the antis as 'squeamish' and 'bleeding hearts' and then use extremely emotive arguments, co-opting the experiences of the victims of crime, to support their arguments. Am I the only one that finds that slightly ironic?