- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- Messages
- 25,662
- Reaction score
- 21,196
- Location
- Fort Drum, New York
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
I've never stated that an expanded pool would be a bad thing; just that it would not make much, if any, difference.
I would think that those arguing for change would be the one's that would have to justify their position by proving some significant benefit. :shrug:
.
I wouldn't mind a change as long as the benefits outweigh the risks. I see no reason why there should be "significant" benefits to justify the change, it is more a matter of principle for me. There's no reason why someone born outside the country is less capable of doing the job (as long as they prove to be loyal citizens). They have every right to be qualified for the job as natural-born citizens. If you're an employer and you want to hire, you don't cut out a bunch of potential employees because of where they were born. That's how I see it.
Last edited: