Re: Should school uniforms be banned?
Dude, your response was not even remotely connected to what we were discussing. Bull****ting and attacking me isn't going to change that.
Nope, you keep on about being referred to as inferior, when all we are doing is telling you that you don't know what you are talking about. It has nothing to do with being inferior, and I am going to stop discussing this matter with you since you either don't understand it or you are being dishonest about it.
The whole matter is essentially this... we had a baby that had colic, and when we mentioned this to other parents that had babies that had colic, they would say stuff like, "IMG, I know what you mean (or how you feel), our baby did too". We never once got a response from a parent that did not have a baby with colic that included "I understand" or " I know"... it was always something like, "I can only imagine" or "I am sorry to hear that, it must be tough". Why? Because they did not know what it was like. Sure, they read the books and heard our stories, but not having gone through it, they understood that they did not understand what it was truly like. You though, you just think, "I have an imagination, seen some movies, read some books, I know as much about it as Bodi, because I am more objective!" Complete and utter horse ****. Sorry dude... you just make yourself sound so ignorant. Im getting tired of you as well. Talking out of your ass without showing an ounce of compromise stinks of naivety coupled with arrogance. Angry teenager syndrome, really.
It is not something you are likely to see because it is simply your presumption that I must be a teenager in order to have the opinions I have. Rather, you just jump to an incorrect conclusion based off minimal evidence.
Dude, you are most likely not a teenager... it was a ****ing joke. Hello? After this idiotic back and forth in which you show very little ability to understand, I would venture to say that I am on a far higher plane or awareness than you, hence my frustration with you. Just gonna be done with you like I was last time, pretty quick...
It was with regards to your attitude on this subject and why you keep using the word "argumentative"? This is an argument so it is only natural that it would be argumentative. Do you meant to say "debatable"?
No, I mean
argumentative... it is a legal term and has a meaning. Look it up. I know what it means since I have used it when representing myself in a case that I won in court.
You cannot have nailed me because those responses are simply the truth. If I say I was not talking to you, then I was not. If I say I was not referring to certain comments then I was not. If I say that is what someone else said than it was. The only pattern here is you being unable to follow this discussion.
If we are talking and you say something, I call you on it, and you respond... "I wasn't talking to you", then you shouldn't have posted it in a post addressed to me in a conversation that you and I are having. If that is me being unable to follow a conversation, I would counter that you don't understand how to have a proper conversation.
Except the reason someone is not conscious of a feeling or desire is because said individual does not ever consider it. I am telling you that I would have been conscious of any such desire to be controlled.
Holy moly... this is geting retarded. Children don't want to "be controlled", they want structure and consistency. Their want isn't conscious. They need them. They need routines. Studies show that when children are raised in a caring and structured environment, they are healthier and more well adjusted than those that aren't. A structured environment has rules and consequences. The parent is in charge. Can't you grasp any of this? The children, even aware ones, aren't sitting there saying, "I want to be controlled.". Any parent would say, and many of us have, that you don't know what you are talking about... why? You lack experience, that's why.
We tell children where they can and can't go. My daughters often come up to me and ask what they are allowed to do or where they are allowed to go, since they know that I am looking out for their safety. They want that. Sorry you refuse to understand this.
Except you experience most likely carries it with some emotional association. I do not expect rape victims to be capable of objectively analyzing the experience. Any experience of emotional significance is likely to weigh on your objectivity.
Yes, but the key factor is that I have experience and you have none. So my tainted experience wins, since you don't have any at all.
You have said more than that.
No, not really. I have stuck with one line, and that is that you are naive about the subject. I have described it in other ways, but never about being inferior or lesser than me as a person, just ignorant about what parenting truly entails.
Are you trying to imply that such alleged resent is the reason for my opinion? You are wrong if that is what you mean to imply.
I am more objective than you, since you have been through it, by your reasoning... hence, your emotional association is likely to weigh on your objectivity and my conclusion is correct. Sorry...
Are you ****ing kidding me!? I already ****ing did, for ****'s sake!
Nope. You hve offered unsubstantiated opinions about control and uniforms. You have offered not one shred of evidence about uniforms, which is the topic at hand and the one that I want to get back to in order to sum this ridiculous debate up. You have shown nada about parenting and zip about uniforms for pete's sake...
That is true, but there are many other events and people who can have a more powerful effect. Sometimes the negative actions of a person influence an individual for the better.
That is true....
but. That is kinda how you think, isn't it?