View Poll Results: Redistribution of Wealth

74. You may not vote on this poll
  • The wealth has been redistributed UPWARDS

    34 45.95%
  • The wealth has been redistributed DOWNWARDS

    33 44.59%
  • The wealth has not been redistributed

    1 1.35%
  • Other/I don't know

    6 8.11%
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 92 of 92

Thread: Redistribution of Wealth

  1. #91
    Tavern Bartender
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Seen
    05-25-18 @ 01:46 PM

    Re: Redistribution of Wealth

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    I would like those who chose downwards to explain why the top 2% control 95% of the wealth--because if it is being distributed downwards, they're doing a piss-poor job...

    ...this should be interesting.
    You have a source?
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS. #MAGA

  2. #92

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:25 AM
    Slightly Liberal

    Re: Redistribution of Wealth

    Quote Originally Posted by American View Post
    You have a source?
    While I did not vote there is a response to your question. Perhaps you and many who phrase the question as you do miss the point. Rather than look at the top few percent and see that much wealth is held there, it would instructive to look at the list of the top wealthest people fourty years ago and the same list today to see if the list has changed materially.

    So The two richest people in the U.S. Gates and Buffet were not among the richest people in the 70's. In the post industrial period we continue to see a shrinking of the middle class, while the top 1% has a bigger slice of the pie. Look at who our economy rewards people. If you come up with an idea like facebook or Groupon you can become a billionaire. If you can hit a golf ball 300 yards like tiger you can make 100 million dollars a year. That is in our economy you can impact more people than ever before such as the examples above. However if you can shovel snow you are limited to the amount of driveways to can shovel before you get tired. You also compete with everyone who has the skills to shovel a driveway, including those who do it for themselves, and pay zero.

    So it is not the fact that there are haves and have nots. The government taxes at about the same rate of GDP as our historical average. We are spending well in excess of that average. We also know that the tax system has changed over the last fourty years so that now many more people pay zero federal taxes. So it would seem that there is more spending for lesser income people, and on average the higher income folks are paying an increased percent of GDP as there are more people paying zero.

    Perhaps a better question is what is the proper amount of income redistribution downward versus the silly question of which way does redistribution flow.

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts