• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FOX and MSNBC

Is Fox news bias and obviously leans right? Yes/No

  • YES, FOX news is bias and obviously leans right

    Votes: 33 94.3%

  • NO, FOX news is NOT bias and does NOT lean right.

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • Total voters
    35
Where are you getting those examples?

The only adjective use of "bias" is in describing an angled cut of a physical object, and that's archaic. The noun form is "biasness." Not the same word at all.

The adjective form of "bias" in terms of prejudice of thought is "biased."
 
Harshaw said:
Where are you getting those examples?

The only adjective use of "bias" is in describing an angled cut of a physical object, and that's archaic. The noun form is "biasness." Not the same word at all.

The adjective form of "bias" in terms of prejudice of thought is "biased."
Click to expand...

hmmmm not sure, its what I thought I read on websters or somewhere Id have to go back I could easily be wrong because I admit grammar isnt my strongest suit lol

I thought websters said its chiefly used for fabric, so its mainly used but not exclusively but again i have to go look

and TECHNICALLY (me being a jaskass) if your argument is true it would still be ok to use it as an adjective, just not in the political meaning which many do including myself, you werent specific ;) but thats me just having fun with you
 
It's also used for food, wood grain, and other things you might cut. But not for prejudice of mind.
 
Harshaw said:
Where are you getting those examples?

The only adjective use of "bias" is in describing an angled cut of a physical object, and that's archaic. The noun form is "biasness." Not the same word at all.

The adjective form of "bias" in terms of prejudice of thought is "biased."
Click to expand...

hmmm at quick glance it seems you may very well be right and I misunderstood
seems websters DOES say that biasness is the noun of bias(fabric cutting)
Bias - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary


dictionary.com is unclear and some others are too that I looked at BUT Websters is good enough for me! I stand corrected sir:Oopsie

bias is an adj BUT only in the form of cutting of materials
 
hmmmmm Id like to know how Grim, Zimmer, Turtledude and Whovian would vote on this thread?:angel?:


and as soon as I shift back throw my posts theres a guy who is a huge olbermann fan, Id like him to vote in the other thread
 
For so many to think that FOX "news" is not biased tells me that the radical conservatives have polluted this poll.
Its now meaningless..
BTW, I feel that many portions of FOX are OK, but I do not completely trust FOX.
When I want something honest and truthful, I'll listen to NPR and PBS.
 
earthworm said:
For so many to think that FOX "news" is not biased tells me that the radical conservatives have polluted this poll.
Its now meaningless..
BTW, I feel that many portions of FOX are OK, but I do not completely trust FOX.
When I want something honest and truthful, I'll listen to NPR and PBS.
Click to expand...

yeah I already mentioned this
funny that these polls and the gay rights polls always get spammed??? hmmmmmmm can somebody say insecurity

you can just click on the numbers above and it shows you who really voted the REAL numbers are 31 votes for yes and 2 for no and though I wont assume anything officially reading through the two posts and looking at the other thread the two no votes probably arent real BUT one yes vote IMO is a lie because it goes against everything they post but oh well

real vote 94% yes
 
Last edited:
WeAreReborn said:
Lol no. There would be a place like a grocery store or a warehouse that contains all the products. Every day once you finish your work you would get a slip saying you worked for the day and then you could take all you need/want. Though there is a variant with checks that measure your time and each product would be measured in that way. There could be eat out restraunts or a large communal kitchen in which others could help you make the food or even do it for their work. It all depends if there is enough labor at hand, though I'm sure there will be.
Click to expand...

Definitely futuralistic and progressive, surely not conservative stick-in-the-mud.
But, for me?
no..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom