- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Boy but you folks like to don the referee shirt and render a verdict don't you? And surprise surprise, you always render a verdict which has you winning and the other side losing. That is amazing.
Need a tissue? Your fail is entirely your own.
The only thing I have conceded is making an error in the number I was using. And the number is irrelevant to the principle involved and the fundamental difference between the power to interpret the law and the Constitution
Nope. You kept saying "hundreds" because in a number of cases that large (so you imply), there would have had to have been plenty of interpretation of the Constitution. That's why you kept insisting it was "hundreds."
One power (to interpret the law and Constitution) is used in the application of the second (judicial review) .
Then go for it, champ. Let's see how they did it. I mean, come on -- in 12 cases with 11 decisions issued, this shouldn't be a tough order.