A wholly inadequate dismisal.
The standard you want to inteject here is meaningless, and, because of its nature, will continue to be meaningless, no matter how many times you try to interject it.
I'm not arguing with your ability to use your precious, mystical warp cure-all.
You say that like its inconsequential.
You might as well be arguing that while a platoon of M1A2 can utterly destory an entire Roman legion w/o any harm to itself, the advantage given by the M1s can be ignored.
I'm referring to the logistics of coordinating simultaneous warp jumps with hundreds of Federation starships
This denotes a lack uf understanding. There are no warp jumps to coordinate -- there is warp-speed combat manuver to coordinate, which has been demonstrated.
That Star Fleet is a FLEET with a command structure, illustrated in FTL combat to the squadron level - indicates an ability to corrdinate fleets of ships in battle. It is, after all, their purpose...
...executing hard turns through thousands of tightly grouped Imperial battle formations...
False premise. There's no deomstrable need fer the Fed ships to get inside Imperial formations.
Imperials may fight like wet-navy ships of the line, but that's forced by their limited naval technology.
My argument was that since they have never demonstrated that tactic on a large scale...
Is meaningless, given your false premise and obvious lack of understanding of the issue.
they'd be unlikely to suddenly change their standard tactics of engagement..
Aside from the fact that you have not shown this to be a standard tactic... in fact, the only even remotely relevant canon shows that they ARE able to coordinate the efforts of at least a squadron in FTL combat against a FTL opponent... they would be CERTAIN to change their supposed 'standard tactic' if it meant they could engage the enemy w/o any chance of taking damage - which it unquestionably does.
Let me repeat that:
They would be CERTAIN to change their supposed 'standard tactic' if it meant they could fully engage the enemy w/o any chance of taking damage - which it unquestionably does.
Refute that.