In science class, teach science. In religion class, teach religion. It shouldn't be that hard.
BTW, intelligent design is creationism. Just saying . . . .
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.
If the sex organs did not evolve at the same time and the offspring were not viable then they would die out and be a dead end. Plus the guy with the deformed cock is less likely to pass on his genes
As far as the evolution of sex organs of other animals (mammalia especially), they are VERY similar to ours, but regardless of even this, the survival of another species (or divergent lineage on any level) does not depend on their sex organs being compatible with another lineage -they need to be compatible with themselves, and only themselves.
You are pointing out definitive examples of what evolution is, and the mechanisms that drive it as some kind of conundrum that speaks against evolution.. kinda silly.
Last edited by marduc; 10-28-10 at 12:04 PM.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Drugs are bad, prohibition is worse
I never understood intelligent design, clearly we are not intelligently designed
It seems we just barely get by with what we got.
I use a lot of satire and sarcasm so keep that in mind when reading my posts.
Moderator's Warning: friday has been thread banned.
"Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run
Mace Windu: Then our worst fears have been realized. We must move quickly if the Jedi Order is to survive.
Originally Posted by johnny_rebson:
These are the same liberals who forgot how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.
Creationism and intelligent design cannot possible be science because they are based on the Bible, which pre-dates the western sciences as we know them. Even Vatican scholars acknowledge this.
Science investigates and alters its laws according to new data. Creationism and intelligent design are not hypotheses, they are set beliefs which creationists then go out to find proof for. Their methodology alone makes them unscientific. A conclusion should never be pre-determined before an experiment is even set to begin.