Not knowing nothing works on so many levels.
Only if you consider every teacher everywhere to be trying to convert their students to their religion. The effort is to get people to think more critically and rationally about their beliefs. That's not religion, that's reality. Sorry you can't tell the difference.Originally Posted by UtahBill
Value, no. Fact, yes. It is absolutely up to everyone to work to determine what is actually real and what is fantasy. If someone believes that there is no gravity and if they jump off the top of a tall building, they won't fall, that belief may have plenty of value to the believer, but he's also wrong. If he jumps off that building, no matter how strongly he believes, no matter how much faith he has, he's still going to be a puddle on the sidewalk. Strength of conviction means jack squat to reality.Value of beliefs for others is not for any other person to decide. Why would you want to take away the pain medications for someone who really needs them? It is about the same thing.
I can't take away any pain medications if they don't have any to begin with. It's like homeopathy. It's WATER! It does nothing, no matter how strongly you believe it does. It's a placebo, nothing more. There might be some minor use in a placebo, but it's far preferable to get actual medicine that actually works. You argue that people "really need them", but the fact is, they want them. It's not need, it's a desire, usually borne out of ignorance. People just don't know any better. They've never been taught to think critically, to care about the facts and deal with reality as it actually is. It's a lot easier to play make-believe than it is to deal with actual problems head-on.
Sorry, that's just a pathetic position to take. I don't want to tell people that if they pray to a statue, they'll be fed, I want to teach them how to feed themselves! Sure, it's harder, but the results are far more predictable and positive.
I would like to believe that you are sincere but ignorant. Most of us know praying won't get wheat shipped from where it grows well (but not so much lately) to those who are unable to grow it, thanks to drought, pestilence, etc.. Most of us already know that we won't get food by praying for it. Those who don't have food don't need to be taught either. They need to be fed. They know how already, but you can't fight city hall or mother nature. If it wasn't for charity, often from christian sources, they would starve. The religions donating are showing that they at least subscribe to Matt. chap. 25. What athiest groups are there helping the world's poorest people get fed?
Oracle of Utah
Truth rings hollow in empty heads.
No. It does. Not.If you look at nature as a whole it would scream for a creator. People must have faith that God does not exist, because by faith they reject the proofs and things that suggest a creator.
Um yes, and a creator regardless of how much you claim that it can be simply can't be proven through a test tube. Gravity can be put in a test tube. Here's an example of how to prove the existence of gravity with a test tube. Drop it. What do you think makes it fall through air and come smashing into the ground? Now try a similar approach for a creator? Seriously, read a little about scientific evidence and how experiments work.We can prove gravity though science, but we can't put gravity in a test tube.
I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK
I posted this video in another thread, but I'll post it here too:
Henry Markram builds a brain in a supercomputer | Video on TED.com
I know that I exist to me, but I do not know for sure that you exist to you. All I have is my own reality. The rest is a series of decisions and suppositions about the nature of your reality. Every brain has the same basic components, but the orchestration of those components is unique to every individual. The only reason why we can communicate across such barriers is because we make a wide variety of assumptions about the reality of the person we are talking to. In other words, I assume that your reality must be like mine, and thus I take for granted that the way you interpret my views must also be the same. Enter miscommunication, social unrest, and war.
As long as people seek to find "correctness" in the theism vs. atheism debate, the arguments will be never ending. It doesn't occur to most people that you can unify the two sides into a singular concept. They can mutually exist in one mind, or exist separately in different minds. All combinations are possible. In other words, a person whose reality revolves around God and a person whose reality revolves around the absence of God can BOTH be correct!
If someone wants to ignore it and get it out of their life they *can't* learn about what happened - well - everywhere, at any time in history.
I don't think there's a single thing I haven't learned in my Art History, World Civilization, or even Law class that doesn't related or decend *from* religous beliefs.
The notion of a religious-free living is *very* modern. . . most countries throughout history had religions as their center - very *few* lived without religion being an intricate part of their lives or setting the rules for which they did things by.
A screaming comes across the sky.
It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow
Charities are actually realizing that pushing religion harms them when it comes to donations, that's why the Christian Children's Fund dropped "Christian" from their name and became ChildFund International. More people are apt to donate if they think the charity is actually helping people and not poisoning their minds with religious nonsense.
Yes it does. Why does it not?No. It does. Not.
And neither can you prove that all things rose from abiogenesis. You can't go years into the past and see it happening. Even if remotely plausible (which it isn't) no one can prove that this is how life started. What is the physical property of gravity? It's like time, it isn't physical but it does indeed exist. You can't put time and gravity in a test tube. They aren't physical things. Regardless, even the test tube itself in my opinion proves God exists. Where did the atoms come from that comprise it? Why is it there? How were those atoms created? By the Creator.Um yes, and a creator regardless of how much you claim that it can be simply can't be proven through a test tube. Gravity can be put in a test tube. Here's an example of how to prove the existence of gravity with a test tube. Drop it. What do you think makes it fall through air and come smashing into the ground? Now try a similar approach for a creator? Seriously, read a little about scientific evidence and how experiments work.
Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates