• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should we move away from abstinence only sex education?

Should we move away from abstinence only sex education?


  • Total voters
    53
I think we should just bring back chastity belts. There problem solved:twocents::soap:cuckoo:
 
I think we should just bring back chastity belts. There problem solved:twocents::soap:cuckoo:

It was just increase anal sex since you really can't block the pooper. :mrgreen:
 
It was just increase anal sex since you really can't block the pooper. :mrgreen:

no unwanted pregnancies are caused by travelling the hershey highway!
 
I think we should be moving more towards abstinence only sex education. I also think that is an area for parents, and that schools shouldn't try to parent or instill sexual morals into children. The only safe sex is abstinence. There would be no teen pregnancies, STDs, and crying girls in the hallways. Abstinence education is the best form of sex ed.
 
I think we should be moving more towards abstinence only sex education. I also think that is an area for parents, and that schools shouldn't try to parent or instill sexual morals into children. The only safe sex is abstinence. There would be no teen pregnancies, STDs, and crying girls in the hallways. Abstinence education is the best form of sex ed.

by teaching abstinence only, schools would be trying to instill morals. they need to teach about available birth control as well.
 
I think we should be moving more towards abstinence only sex education. I also think that is an area for parents, and that schools shouldn't try to parent or instill sexual morals into children. The only safe sex is abstinence. There would be no teen pregnancies, STDs, and crying girls in the hallways. Abstinence education is the best form of sex ed.

The underlined is true Digsbe.

But the fact of the matter is. Teenagers are gonna have sex. The bees do it, The birds do it, we're simply inclined to do it. And while parents perhaps should be the ones to teach them about sex and condoms. Many simply aren't, and I'm sorry but it then lands on the school to pick it up.

It is a travesty, that every teen is not taught what a condom is. One time unprotected sex can kill you. A condom can save you.

In England when we had sex ed. We were taught about condoms, given condoms but got a stern warning. The only sure fire way, to not get an STD or get pregnant is abstinence.

How do you feel about that?
 
I think we should be moving more towards abstinence only sex education. I also think that is an area for parents, and that schools shouldn't try to parent or instill sexual morals into children. The only safe sex is abstinence. There would be no teen pregnancies, STDs, and crying girls in the hallways. Abstinence education is the best form of sex ed.

If the rule could be followed yes. However we do have this pesky problem called human nature that causes abstinance only education to totally fail in practice.
 
Pervert:mrgreen:

........

There are multiple documented examples of girls going for anal sex when they think normal sex is out of the question for whatever reason.
 
There are multiple documented examples of girls going for anal sex when they think normal sex is out of the question for whatever reason.

Well that is because "normal" sex is boring.:2razz:

Gimme some oral some doggie and some anal then a reverse cowgirl, YEEEE HAH
 
Well that is because "normal" sex is boring.:2razz:

Gimme some oral some doggie and some anal then a reverse cowgirl, YEEEE HAH

I don't find it boring :shrug:
 
What we must do is prevent the tea-bagging conservatives from dominating anything.
A three man panel to set policy is my idea.
The three being a conservative , a liberal, and an independent.
It is probably a good idea to have "sex education" in our schools. A better idea is to have a ton more of mandatory parental input.
 
Once you've done it hanging from the chandelier there ain't no turning back:mrgreen:

First off freak (meaning that in a sexual way).

Secondly, I think schools should encourage abstinence only sex, but realize that kids will be kids. Most of us will have sex before we are married and we should know the ways to protect ourselves. I had abstinence only sex ed and I only found out about stuff through hearing friends talk about actually having sex. Well that and the internet.
 
I think we should be moving more towards abstinence only sex education. I also think that is an area for parents, and that schools shouldn't try to parent or instill sexual morals into children. The only safe sex is abstinence. There would be no teen pregnancies, STDs, and crying girls in the hallways. Abstinence education is the best form of sex ed.

I am certian that it can be proven that "abstinance" is not effective, but may work in the far future, 500 years from now.
We must keep religion out of our schools. The human factor must be considered.
 
First off freak (meaning that in a sexual way).

Secondly, I think schools should encourage abstinence only sex, but realize that kids will be kids. Most of us will have sex before we are married and we should know the ways to protect ourselves. I had abstinence only sex ed and I only found out about stuff through hearing friends talk about actually having sex. Well that and the internet.

I think schools should encourage a common sense approach and that includes both abstinence and BC.
 
Simple question, yes or no, and explain your answer.

Personally I think we should, it doesn't provide our kids with a proper sex education, and doesn't prepare them for the real world. I also think that sex education should include information on LGBT issues, and I think that our schools should offer condoms to our students with no questions asked.
Education?
YES
Condoms?
NO
 
Once you've done it hanging from the chandelier there ain't no turning back:mrgreen:

I always thought the point of no return was doing it doggy style while dangling from a tightrope by your little toe over a pool full of saltwater crocodiles with dildos for teeth.
 
I was staring at the question intently before finally realizing you was talking about US. I'm very slow today :doh

Abstinence hasn't been taught in UK sex education classes for a while. My own sex ed was more about love in primary, then pregnancy and then in secondary when I was a teen. Safe sex and diseases :shrug:
Europe is probably 20 years ahead of us in this field as well.
But, IMO, as Christians constitute 5 to 50% of our population, their abstinence should be taught, of course, NOT as the only thing.
 
I think we should get back to basics and force parents to actually parent their ****ing kids instead of expecting the school system to do it for them.

That's why johnny can't read. the school is too busy trying to teach him all the **** his parents are supposed to that there is no time to teach him how to read, write, do basic math, etc.
The children should recieve about 50% of their education from their parents.
The problem is, not all children have parents.
My idea is that the parents should be less greedy for material goods and spend more time with their "out-put". This means a more modest standard of living, less luxuries.
 
I'm so tired of these state's rights people.

If some backward enclave wants to teach that babies come from Mr. Stork, I'd be happy to let them leave the Union so non-idiots can bring about proper education for their citizens.
I feel that "states rights" has merits.
We have a huge nation, do you really expect South Carolina to be the equal of Massachusetts?
They need time, these things cannot be forced.
 
It seems very strange to find someone who claims to be Very liberal using terms like:"normal, and healthy human behavior" when talking about sex because liberals have what many might say is a perverted view of what is: "normal, and healthy human behavior" when sex is the subject.

Most Liberals either don't know or choose to ignore Genesis 19. The Depravity of Sodom tha6 begins: "The two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them, and bowed down with his face to the ground. 2He said, ‘Please, my lords, turn aside to your servant’s house and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you can rise early and go on your way.’ They said, ‘No; we will spend the night in the square.’ 3But he urged them strongly; so they turned aside to him and entered his house; and he made them a feast, and baked unleavened bread, and they ate. 4But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house; 5and they called to Lot, ‘Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, so that we may know them."

And so I skip ahead to: Genesis 24 "Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulphur and fire from the Lord out of heaven; 25and he overthrew those cities, and all the Plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground."

I don't condemn anyone nor do I hate them I hate the sins of man not the sinner.

My intent is to show that Christians who believe in and follow the word will have a different view of what "is normal, and healthy human behavior."

As far as teaching our children I believe that even when someone trys to tell the truth about sex they fail to tell the truth about what it means and actually feels like by somehow trying to frighten them away rather than being honest but also include the proper knowledge to protect them from the pit falls and dangers of unprotected sex and the danger of sex with people we don't really know anything about.

The same is true when it comes to drug use. Children are lied to about the false dangers of pot and if they try it they are more likely to think Hell they lied to me about pot, did they lie to me about coke and heroin and that is what leads some to believe that pot is a gateway drug.

It's not the pot, it's the lies we tell that lead to addiction. Trust me I know this to be a solid fact.

I have never done any illegal drug past pot but I am imminently versed in what it is to be addicted to legal drugs legally obtained for real medical conditions.

I've never heard of a single liberal, or person in general for that matter, that advocated and/or taught that we should rape anyone, male or female, especially if they believed the anyone was an angel of God. I would love to see proof that someone on here has ever advocated raping angels.
 
Back
Top Bottom