And you lose the argument because, in your ignorance you broke Godwin's Law.
You decided to use the lamest of the lame arguments.
And yet you want to pretend omniscience, which is typical of Godwin Law violators.
This has generally been frowned upon by the American public until recently.
And when you become less ignorant, you'll realize that in a free society there's a difference between an act being "frowned upon" and prohibited.
America is still mostly free.
Free enough so men can ignore the frowns of the Messiah in the White House.
What an ironic and tragic twist of fate. Merely calling it a "right" changes the whole thing. It doesn't take much to justify things does it?
Here's a conceptual nugget for you:
It's their freedom, they're not required to justify what they do with it to anyone, including you, Hillary Clinton, General Petreaus, or the Messiah.
In fact, the President, the Secretary of State, and the General are all obligated to defend that man's freedom to burn that stupid book without once demanding he explain himself to them.
Yet we can't find ourselves understanding why other civilization's fanatics can justify their behaviors.
I don't recall asking anyone else's fanatics to justify themselves. I don't care their reasons, or if they have any at all. If they take violent action against us, I want them dead. It's as simple as that.
I say we re-create the world.
Well, e-mail Allah and tell him to get moving, then.