• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay Marriage, is it right to stop it? (PART II)

Gay Marriage, is it right to stop it? (PART II)


  • Total voters
    154
That passage has to do with a diet high purines, which yes is harmful; as is sodomy. A single clam probably won't harm you, but make it a staple and you're in trouble.

Can you give a legitimate study on where sodomoy is harmful? And assuming you are in fact correct, why should you control it and why do you assume homosexuals indulge in frequent amounts of sodomy?
 
Pairings which are the most likely to fail over time. Examples include the financially volatile, mixed race, mixed religion and 2 men (not 2 women).

The whole "let consenting adults do what they want" mantra ignores whether or not their choice is a smart or wise choice and how their relationship affects everyone else. No one lives in a vacuum.

wow thats dumb I guess we should do studies on everything no matter whos rights it violates

from now on no whites can play in the NBA because obviously blacks are more successful
women cant run for office any more men are more successful
blacks cant play hockey any more whites are more successful
etc etc etc
all BS and and discrimination

also a HUGE newsflash how do we know that man man marriages would be high risk? we dont allow them. if society changed may the risk would to?

oh yeah Im using logic again silly me LMAO

in america its simply none of your business nor mine PERIOD lol
 
:prof Sentences begin with capitol letters.

Capitol is spelled capital :prof :lamo
Pairings which are the most likely to fail over time. Examples include the financially volatile, mixed race, mixed religion and 2 men (not 2 women).

The whole "let consenting adults do what they want" mantra ignores whether or not their choice is a smart or wise choice and how their relationship affects everyone else. No one lives in a vacuum.
Why should you decide what is best for others?
 
Last edited:
:prof Sentences begin with capitol letters.

translation: I cant back up what I say because theres no logic behind it nor do I have answers for you

thats what I though lol

:laughat:
 
:2wave:
Pairings which are the most likely to fail over time. Examples include the financially volatile, mixed race, mixed religion and 2 men (not 2 women).

The whole "let consenting adults do what they want" mantra ignores whether or not their choice is a smart or wise choice and how their relationship affects everyone else. No one lives in a vacuum.

LOLWUT???:2wave:
 
Can you give a legitimate study on where sodomoy is harmful?
Yeah I probably could dig up some info on the drip, urinary tract infections and the ease of contracting an std through the rectum. I KNOW I could provide data on alcohol's harmfulness, but that's legal, so this isn't a case of "it's harmful therefore it should be banned"; which also mean this is not a case of "it's not harmful therefore it should be legal".

The harm principal has no home in US law.

And assuming you are in fact correct, why should you control it and why do you assume homosexuals indulge in frequent amounts of sodomy?

The state, not me, should control the licenses it issues because the state has a compelling interest in couples raising children.
 
Did you know that fellatio is sodomy? So you don't let girls give you head?

Oral sex is also mildly risky. Of course, breathing is bad for your health, since you take in toxins with every breath. We should ban/regulate breathing!
 
Oral sex is also mildly risky. Of course, breathing is bad for your health, since you take in toxins with every breath. We should ban/regulate breathing!

teh govt'z tellin m3 wut 2 doo?
 
Really? That might be why I never said anything about private.

You sure did, right here:
So you are a conservative who believes in much more government control over personal decisions?

It's not a personal decision. You are not the only party involved. The state is a signing party in that contract, so shutting out the state is like shutting out your would-be spouse.

It's a public, communal decision. You already have to comply with the community's restrictions on whom you can select to marry. Sex is but one of those restrictions no different than marital status.
 
The state, not me, should control the licenses it issues because the state has a compelling interest in couples raising children.

this tired thoroughly debunked argument LMAO
children? state dont give a damn about children in this matter
thats why they dont ask you if your going to have kids nor do they care
thats why people can get married with no intention of having them
thats why people who cant have kids can also get married

now if you want to start you own thread about how only people that raise kids should get married have at it, you'l probably come up short in that thread too but just like you invalid argument thats a different issue
 
You sure did, right here:


It's not a personal decision. You are not the only party involved. The state is a signing party in that contract, so shutting out the state is like shutting out your would-be spouse.

It's a public, communal decision. You already have to comply with the community's restrictions on whom you can select to marry. Sex is but one of those restrictions no different than marital status.

So I guess if we stretch the meaning of the word personal to mean something that it doesn't, then you have a point, otherwise you are off in some far out bizarro world that has nothing to do with what I am saying.

By the way, your same argument could be used to further regulate or ban guns.
 
Did you know that fellatio is sodomy? So you don't let girls give you head?

Hey, I just mentioned that liquor is harmful right, and yet here I am drinking :2wave:

As I said, this is not a case of "it's harmful so ban it", nor is this a case of "it's harmless so legalize it".

A careful reader would notice that I haven't spoken out against gay marriage on this thread.
 
So I guess if we stretch the meaning of the word personal to mean something that it doesn't, then you have a point, otherwise you are off in some far out bizarro world that has nothing to do with what I am saying.

By the way, your same argument could be used to further regulate or ban guns.

this is common place for him and this issue, just like his "marriage is for children" debate
 
this is common place for him and this issue, just like his "marriage is for children" debate

Yes, Jerry would have a point about marriage, in another universe.
 
Hey, I just mentioned that liquor is harmful right, and yet here I am drinking :2wave:

As I said, this is not a case of "it's harmful so ban it", nor is this a case of "it's harmless so legalize it".

A careful reader would notice that I haven't spoken out against gay marriage on this thread.

well that explains a lot, I was wondering how one gets so off topic, makes meaningless random points and is so void of logic on a particular subject
 
So I guess if we stretch the meaning of the word personal to mean something that it doesn't, then you have a point, otherwise you are off in some far out bizarro world that has nothing to do with what I am saying.

By the way, your same argument could be used to further regulate or ban guns.

I see I'm not the only one tipping the bottle tonight. A 'lil Capt'n?

Sipp'n some Crown, myself.
 
I see I'm not the only one tipping the bottle tonight. A 'lil Capt'n?

Sipp'n some Crown, myself.

I no longer drink actually. That is why my posts are accurate.
 
well that explains a lot, I was wondering how one gets so off topic, makes meaningless random points and is so void of logic on a particular subject

And to think, it all started when someone was like "oh yeah, well the bible bans selfish, too". I guess I saw the irrelevant-tangent-train and jumped aboard. What are we supposed to be talking about, anyway? Gay relationships? State doesn't regulate/stop what you do, so who gives a ****. Go have your fun.
 
I no longer drink actually. That is why my posts are accurate.

Hope Jerry brought his student planner and text book because he just got SCHOOLED
 
And to think, it all started when someone was like "oh yeah, well the bible bans selfish, too". I guess I saw the irrelevant-tangent-train and jumped aboard. What are we supposed to be talking about, anyway? Gay relationships? State doesn't regulate/stop what you do, so who gives a ****. Go have your fun.

either this is a mistype for shellfish or the bible suddenly became some piece of leftist awesome!
 
either this is a mistype for shellfish or the bible suddenly became some piece of leftist awesome!

It was my computer. My keyboard misspells all the time.
 
Back
Top Bottom