The denial is yours.so its sort of a denial, and then, .......they should do it.
Good equals value. Fact does not equal value. It is OK to teach fact. It is not OK to teach good.
I'll just keep repeating the above until you get it.
Nope I never said that. Please try to debate what I said, not what you want me to have said.well you say schools are not teaching anything about homosexuality, OK, well i will provide proof.
All irrelevant since they have nothing to do with my argument.American Power: California Public Schools to Teach Homosexual Curriculum to Children as Young as Kindergartners
CA Gov. Signs Pro-Homosexual School Indoctrination Bills; Likely to Affect Nation’s Schoolchildren | Family Policy Network
Calif Gov Signs Gay Education Bill | Advocate.com
Yes, that is correct. The other side has no facts.again you say, facts on on your side, they might be, however, their are people who are on the opposite end of the spectrum, who would say they have the facts..........are your facts, the only truth, and everyone else with a different point of view is wrong?
OK.as for me, i stated what i think, and thats all, however, as i said i have only opinion, ...which means nothing, i against any government force, that is my problem and that force comes in many ways, not just this issue here.
Irrelevant. I do not support schools teaching morality so in reference to what we are discussing, I don't care what the bible says.would you agree that the bible [ and i dont like getting in the bible ,but i will for this statement] teaches moral values, and part of that is homosexuality is wrong, and therefore not normal.
The bible is teaching morality. The FACT that homosexuality is normal is a FACT. The bible is wrong from a factual standpoint. The government is teaching a fact. Getting it yet?so if a child is taught homosexuality is wrong thru bible teachings, that child is receiving a moral teaching, ....now you want the school to teach homosexuality is normal, well teaching it is normal or abnormal, is still teaching from a moral perspective, whether you want to admit it or not...so government would be teaching from a moral position.
It is the duty of government to teach facts. Yet you seem opposed to that.government is not charged in its power to teach people there personal morals, it is not a duty of government.
Since as I have proven, that is not happening, your comment above is irrelevant.so for the issue like this one, i have heard its history, its science, and its facts, to justify the cause of teaching people the current government form of morality.