crebigsol
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2010
- Messages
- 486
- Reaction score
- 34
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
What the hell are you talking about?
You have successfully confused me.
Didn’t you judge me “It appears that you don't like the NAACP...”?
Don’t you expect me to accept or reject your judging?
If I accept, won’t you see me as a racist? Won’t it be a scary political responsibility for me to assume?
After your following statement, don’t you want people to accept your view about NAACP being correct?
Well, how do they define "black people", or "colored people", or whoever they claim to represent?
Depending on the method of definition, they may or may not represent some "white people".
I'm 99% sure there's a white person out there whose great-great-something-mother was a slave raped by her owner.
Should the NAACP not rep them cause' they have white skin? What's the purpose of the NAACP, anyway?
Then, when you encounter some opinion disagreeing with yours, instead of refuting with reason, you judge his opinion as “wall of rant”, and judge him as a person being politically incorrect. As to reason and logic, they are totally absent in your judgement.
Don't you think that you have been doing something that you don't want me to do?
I believe I am more entitled than you to say the following:
What the hell are you talking about?
You have successfully confused me.
Last edited: