• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Shirley Sherrod sue Fox News and Andrew Breitbart for their lies?

Should Shirley Sherrod sue Fox News and Andrew Breitbart for their lies?

  • Yes

    Votes: 19 45.2%
  • No

    Votes: 23 54.8%

  • Total voters
    42
Simple yes or no.

Apparenlty you don't watch Fox news and base a lot of your information on what Media matters or some other liberal rag has said. Because if you did actually watch fox news then you would know that Fox news had nothing to do with Sherrod getting fired.
 
What is there to even debate? If a private citizen wants to sue a company that she alleges hurt her why should anybody else have a say?
 
What is there to even debate? If a private citizen wants to sue a company that she alleges hurt her why should anybody else have a say?

She's going after the wrong person. Brietbart didn't fire her. He put an out of context (incomplete) video on his website. This is done daily by everyone in the media.
He said the tape was sent to him in that context. He fell for it just as the WH and the NAACP did. What's hilarious is that the NAACP had the tape in it's entirety yet still denounced her.
 
She's going after the wrong person. Brietbart didn't fire her. He put an out of context (incomplete) video on his website. This is done daily by everyone in the media.
He said the tape was sent to him in that context. He fell for it just as the WH and the NAACP did. What's hilarious is that the NAACP had the tape in it's entirety yet still denounced her.

You still didn't answer the question. If somebody wants to sue a company why should anybody else have a say? 'He said she said,' whatever you argue here is meaningless. Its the judge's decision not the public's. Is the debate whether the general public should decide that some people have no right to sue? Or some organizations cannot be sued?
 
No buddy, "the real clowns here" are those that are still making excuses for the racebaiters. And those intellectually dishonest enough to fail to acknowledge only half of "the story" yet again. The DIFFERENCE between the lying liars at Fox Noise and the King of the RaceBaiters, Breitbarf, and The Whitehouse and the NAACP, is that the WH and the NAACP have acknowledged the mistake of going off without all of the facts, made a Mia Culpa and apologized. Your pukes haven't.

But you knew that, however, you just CAN'T take the honest path. Typical conservative "values."

Go back and check the tapes, kitten. You will find that my position on this was right on the morning the video link was posted and its right today. The thread started back on 19 July...posted by Grim.
 
Yep, she should sue him for libel and defamation until she owns everything but his pants, and then she should go after those. While she's at it, she should consider suing the NAACP, who publicly defamed her as a "racist" without even reviewing its own damned tapes (which exhonorated her), and the Dept of Ag that fired her without even giving her the opportunity to clear her name.

This woman was slandered, libeled, humiliated, she lost her job, her privacy, and her dignity. There isn't enough money in the world to make up for all the pile-on of wrongs that were done to her.
 
Back
Top Bottom