I have not conceeded it. In fact it your argument is illogical as you have not given a valid difference between federal and state government per the argument that you are putting forth. I have showed you what is wrong with it. The fact that you ignore its flaws is your problem not mine.
However, if you wish to persist in this illogical argument in an attempt to win, feel free.
Ultimately though, charity is charity and government taxation is just that, in terms of its effect, the source does not matter. The fact that you think it does, speaks volumes about the depths about the consistency contained in your personal philosophy.
You failed to produce proof that the federal government is more effective and reliable then charity was. I do appreciate your concession.
And you have failed to produce a logical argument. I appreciate YOUR concession.
I did present a logical argument backed with facts. To date you have produced nothing in regards to the point of debate you took issue with. Therefore, under the rules of debate you lose. Declaring yourself the winner and proving it are two different things.