#583 (Is Taxation Slavery?). I even explained why the government hates competition and used facts to support it. I guess this is a case of where liberals do not have to use proof and facts, but their word is good enough. Not for me, so show me.
Last edited by The_Patriot; 07-15-10 at 06:56 PM.
Last edited by tacomancer; 07-15-10 at 07:20 PM.
#588 (Is Taxation Slavery?). You step into the argument demanding proof for something I did not make an argument for originally. If you want proof go after the person that posited that charities aren't effective or as reliable as the government. Thus, you need to present the proof required before I do as a counterpoint.
As I understand things, you responded to someone's post, and megaprogman then responded to your response, demanding proof of your disagreement.
Where is the demand for proof of an arguement you didn't make?
Or are you for some reason claiming that because you were responding to someone elses post, THEY made the arguement, and you simply disagreed?
Still, why would that mean you didn't argue something?
And why would it mean you didn't have to provide proof?
Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller