- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,433
- Reaction score
- 35,279
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Well, I guess you believe everything you read and do not believe experienced people like me who you accuse of lying.
No. I believe things I read, studies that have been conducted, anecdotal evidence that I've observed myself, anecdotal evidence from people I know which all grouped together lead me to what I believe.
What I don't believe is one single, solitary, "druggie" (using it as you used it to describe anyone that has previously used a drug) who has a defintiive and unquestionable agenda and has shown himself completely incapable of dealing with the situation in a rational and intellectually honest way as being some kind of definitive, end all be all, proof that contradicts every single solitary other piece of information out there.
Oh, by the way, if I was to believe you I'd be believing "what I read" as well, because all you're giving me is your opinion of your own experiences typed out on a message board.
Can we get back to the topic? What does the most influential conservative voice in America has to do with addictions with drugs?
The issue was attempts to insult the conservative base by suggesting that Limbaugh was the most influential, and is a drug addicted addicted, therefore conservatives are dumb for being influenced by a "druggie".
The leader of the democratic party got hopped up on Coke, yet we don't see insults flying around that his followers are essentially idiots for listening to him because of it.