Wow...the only non-sickening answer there is "other". I hope none of the above, though if forced to choose, I think Rush is probably the best of the lot. While he's still doing the ol' political propaganda thing, it's not as stupid as the other three. We should tar and feather the lot.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
The conservatives have quite the fair selection, and then we have their TV Bible thumpers..
But the liberals.....who do they have ?...on radio...?
PBS, but this IS "fair and balanced", as it is truthful.
Last edited by earthworm; 06-28-10 at 11:51 AM.
Last edited by LiberalAvenger; 06-28-10 at 11:57 AM.
Tucker Case - Tard magnet.
On the right I don't mind Rush, O'Reilly, and Rivera. Also Hannity can be funny to watch although I feel that he is somewhat incompetent.
On the left I don't mind, Maddow, Shultz, Matthews, and Stewart(if you really want to call that news).
Overall it is much easier to get news/political views from newspapers such as the Washington Post and the WSJ, news magazines, and more than anything else just reading books. At least IMO.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.