View Poll Results: How well does it mesh with your world view?

Voters
53. You may not vote on this poll
  • I am conservative and I think it is very valid to my world view

    3 5.66%
  • I am a conservative and I think its somewhat valid to my world view

    2 3.77%
  • I am a conservative and it is not at all valid to my world view

    7 13.21%
  • I am a liberal and I think it is very valid to my world view

    1 1.89%
  • I am a liberal and I think it is somewhat valid to my world view

    0 0%
  • I am a liberal and it is not at all valid to my world view

    16 30.19%
  • I am a libertarian/other and it is very valid to my world view

    0 0%
  • I am a libertarian/other and it is somewhat valid to my world view

    4 7.55%
  • I am a libertarian/other and it is not at all valid to my world view

    11 20.75%
  • Other (in a post)

    9 16.98%
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 78

Thread: Conservopedia

  1. #61
    Sage
    mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    DC Metro
    Last Seen
    11-13-16 @ 12:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    22,499

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Jucon View Post
    I'm talking about Conservapedia here, not conservatives and liberals.
    Gotcha.....

  2. #62
    Sage
    mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    DC Metro
    Last Seen
    11-13-16 @ 12:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    22,499

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Do you know what Intelligent Design is? Do you understand how principly the notion of "can't explain the eye now = Goddidit" = "can't explain lightning = Zeus" is the same thing?
    What's that have to do with the claim that conservapedia says that animism is a provable science? It doesn't say that, at least not that I could find.

    Legal disclaimer: I don't give a damn about conservapedia.

  3. #63
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mac View Post
    What's that have to do with the claim that conservapedia says that animism is a provable science? It doesn't say that, at least not that I could find.

    Legal disclaimer: I don't give a damn about conservapedia.
    Did you read the quote you quoted?
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  4. #64
    Sage
    mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    DC Metro
    Last Seen
    11-13-16 @ 12:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    22,499

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Did you read the quote you quoted?
    Yeah, I did. It defines animism as a belief, not a "provable science". Did you read it?

  5. #65
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mac View Post
    Yeah, I did. It defines animism as a belief, not a "provable science". Did you read it?
    Did you read the article on Intelligent Design?

    Now re-read my post. And then answer.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  6. #66
    Sage
    mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    DC Metro
    Last Seen
    11-13-16 @ 12:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    22,499

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Did you read the article on Intelligent Design?

    Now re-read my post. And then answer.
    I found no reference to animism in the intelligent design article.

  7. #67
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mac View Post
    I found no reference to animism in the intelligent design article.
    So you don't understand how principly the notion of "can't explain the eye now = Goddidit" = "can't explain lightning = Zeus" is the same thing?
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  8. #68
    don't panic
    marduc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Seen
    10-22-17 @ 04:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,301

    Re: Conservopedia

    Conservepedia reinforces my world view





    at least the portion of my world view that harbors the realization that there are some people that live their entire lives in some misinformed close minded non critical thinking crazy alternate reality that my mind cannot even begin to fathom.

    lemmings.. such funny critters they are.
    Last edited by marduc; 06-26-10 at 02:55 AM.
    Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
    Drugs are bad, prohibition is worse

  9. #69
    Sage
    mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    DC Metro
    Last Seen
    11-13-16 @ 12:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    22,499

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    So you don't understand how principly the notion of "can't explain the eye now = Goddidit" = "can't explain lightning = Zeus" is the same thing?
    Of course I do, this little sub-thread is a result of you saying " They say animism is a testable science." Which it doesn't. You threw in Intelligent Design later, which has nothing to do with your original statement.

  10. #70
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: Conservopedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mac View Post
    Of course I do, this little sub-thread is a result of you saying " They say animism is a testable science." Which it doesn't. You threw in Intelligent Design later, which has nothing to do with your original statement.
    You seem to not understand that Intelligent Design is Aninism. Apparently "can't explain the eye now = Goddidit" = "can't explain lightning = Zeus" that didn't tip you off to that.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •