View Poll Results: PLACE YOUR BETS ON HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE TO GET TO THE 30'S as of June 10, 2010

Voters
46. You may not vote on this poll
  • less than a month

    0 0%
  • a couple months

    3 6.52%
  • 3-4 months

    5 10.87%
  • 5-6 months

    9 19.57%
  • 7-8 months

    7 15.22%
  • 9-10 months

    2 4.35%
  • 11-12 months

    2 4.35%
  • 12-14 months

    1 2.17%
  • 15-16 months

    2 4.35%
  • Never

    15 32.61%
Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 117

Thread: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

  1. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    02-12-11 @ 12:32 PM
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    939

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    Because he is a good, decent CCR with honor and integrity.
    What's CCR?

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    He did not take almost one billion dollars in dirty, filthy, foreign Muslim money to buy the election.
    That doesn't make you a good President...

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    He is a patriotic Christian.
    I didn't know doing cocaine was okay....

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    He is wise.
    You got to be kidding me, he has the lowest IQ of any President in the past 60 years.

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    The econ was the best it EVER WAS under his watch until liberals took over CONgress in '07. By the end of the year we were fcked. Housing was tanking. The DOW was, too. Employment, which had been at "full (4%)" was rising.
    No it wasn't, the average median household income dropped between 2000 and 2007. I would also like you to post the laws that Congress passed, Bush vetoed, and Congress overrode his veto since you believe Congress singlehandedly led us to this awful recession we are in. And just so you know the recession started in 2007 so you can't blame it on that Congress.

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    W took out the world's worst terrorist, brought democracy to Iraq, won the war on terror there
    How did he "win" the war on terror in Iraq? And he did not take out Osama Bin Laden (assuming that's who you mean).

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    crippled alQaida in Af,
    Where's your proof?

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    left no child behind,
    You have got to be kidding me.

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    led this country to its greatest time ever.
    That's pretty vague. What do you mean by greatest time ever? Best recession ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    Despite TWO wars on terror this country was doing amazingly well. The liberals in CONgress ruined it all in less than a year.
    Define "amazingly well" and use proof not just speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    W lied about nothing. Saddam Hussein shipped his wmd to Syria. We have already proved that and Syria admits it. W was an AWESOME man of God/POTUS!
    You are an idiot: A Chart of Bush Lies about Iraq - A BuzzFlash Reader Commentary

    Here?s what Bush said:
    Bush?s Claim
    Reality

    "Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.?

    State of the Union Address ? 1/28/2003
    Iraq has 500 tons of chemical weapons:

    - Sarin gas

    - Mustard gas

    - VX Nerve agent
    Not True

    Zero Chemical Weapons Found
    Not a drop of any chemical weapons has been found anywhere in Iraq

    ?U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein
    had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable
    of delivering chemical agents.?

    State of the Union Address ? 1/28/2003
    Iraq has 30,000 weapons capable of dumping chemical weapons on people
    Not True

    Zero Munitions Found
    Not a single chemical weapon?s munition has been found anywhere in Iraq

    ?We have also discovered through intelligence
    that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas."

    State of the Union Address ? 1/28/2003
    Iraq has a growing fleet of planes capable of dispersing chemical weapons almost anywhere in the world
    Not True

    Zero Aerial Vehicles Found
    Not a single aerial vehicle capable of dispersing chemical or biological weapons, has been found anywhere in Iraq

    "Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people
    now in custody reveal that
    Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaida."

    State of the Union Address ? 1/28/2003
    Iraq aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda

    And implied that Iraq was somehow behind 9/11
    Not True

    Zero Al Qaeda Connection

    To date, not a shred of evidence connecting Hussein with Al Qaida or any other known terrorist organizations have been revealed.
    (besides certain Palestinian groups who represent no direct threat to the US)

    "Our intelligence sources tell us that he (Saddam) has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production."

    State of the Union Address ? 1/28/2003
    Iraq has attempted to purchase metal tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production
    Not True

    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as well as dozens of leading scientists declared said tubes unsuitable for nuclear weapons production -- months before the war.

    "Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at [past nuclear] sites."

    Bush speech to the nation ? 10/7/2002
    Iraq is rebuilding nuclear facilities at former sites.
    Not True

    Two months of inspections at these former Iraqi nuclear sites found zero evidence of prohibited nuclear activities there

    IAEA report to UN Security Council ? 1/27/2003

    "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

    State of the Union Address ? 1/28/2003
    Iraq recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa
    Not True

    The documents implied were known at the time by Bush to be forged and not credible.

    "We know he's been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."

    VP Dick Cheney ? ?Meet the Press? 3/16/2003
    Iraq has Nuclear Weapons for a fact
    Not True

    ?The IAEA had found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq."

    IAEA report to UN Security Council ? 3/7/2003

    "We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in."

    Bush Press Conference 7/14/2003
    Iraq?s Saddam Hussein ?refused to allow UN inspectors into Iraq
    Not True

    UN inspectors went into Iraq to search for possible weapons violations from December 2002 into March 2003
    If you provide a link for that and prove your claims I will apologize for saying Bush lied.

  2. #62
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by chickie View Post
    Saddam Hussein shipped his wmd to Syria.
    Yeah, right. And the Easter Bunny puts candy into baskets every year.


  3. #63
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-bipartisan View Post
    You don't read very well. I have already proved Bush lied.
    No, you havent, as you have not shown that GWB willfully made a statemnet that he knew was false.

    I REALLY shouldnt have to doi this, but since you're unwilling to accept my word for it:

    Lie | Define Lie at Dictionary.com

    lie1    /laɪ/ Show Spelled [lahy] Show IPA noun, verb, lied, ly·ing.
    –noun
    1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.
    2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture:
    –verb (used without object)
    5. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive.

    My 5 year old understands the difference between lying and sinply being wrong -- why dont you?

    Never mind that all of this simply supports my assertion regarding your not-so0slight liberalism...

  4. #64
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-bipartisan View Post
    You don't seem to understand that words can have multiple definitions, and one of the definitions is simply untruthfullness, again learn to read.
    :ROFL:
    The intellectual dishonesty here is amazing.

  5. #65
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    02-12-11 @ 12:32 PM
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    939

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    No, you havent, as you have not shown that GWB willfully made a statemnet that he knew was false.
    I REALLY shouldnt have to doi this, but since you're unwilling to accept my word for it:

    Lie | Define Lie at Dictionary.com

    lie1    /laɪ/ Show Spelled [lahy] Show IPA noun, verb, lied, ly·ing.
    –noun
    1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.
    2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture:
    –verb (used without object)
    5. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive.

    My 5 year old understands the difference between lying and sinply being wrong -- why dont you?

    Never mind that all of this simply supports my assertion regarding your not-so0slight liberalism...
    I never said he did, again learn to read...

  6. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    02-12-11 @ 12:32 PM
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    939

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    You don't seem to understand that a definition for lying is untruthfullness, which Bush was. If you prove untruthfullness isn't a definition (which I have already shown is), then I would be wrong.

  7. #67
    Sage
    Caine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    10-05-17 @ 01:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    23,336

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by Caine View Post
    Oh lord.... this thread is going to bet yet another turned into Bush bashing.

    I think mods should make a special place in the basement or the archives for threads that don't start with the topic of Bush and end up turning into a Bush Bashing escapade.
    OMFG I was soooo right!...
    "I condemn the ideology of White Supremacy and Nazism. They are thugs, criminals, and repugnant, and are against what I believe to be "The American Way" "
    Thus my obligatory condemnation of White supremacy will now be in every post, lest I be accused of supporting it because I didn't mention it specifically every time I post.

  8. #68
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-bipartisan View Post
    You don't seem to understand that a definition for lying is untruthfullness, which Bush was. If you prove untruthfullness isn't a definition (which I have already shown is), then I would be wrong.
    You dont seem to understand that there is clearly more to it than that; your refusal to admit this illustrates the desperate lengths you will go to in order to be able to bash GWB, and firmly illustrates that I am right about the inaccuracy of your "slightly" description.

    When you have to use the LEAST common defintion of a word to make your point, your point is moot.

    My 5 year old understands the difference between lying and simply being wrong -- why dont you?
    Last edited by Goobieman; 08-10-10 at 08:54 PM.

  9. #69
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Seen
    08-17-10 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    151

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-bipartisan View Post
    What's CCR?
    That doesn't make you a good President...
    I didn't know doing cocaine was okay....
    You got to be kidding me, he has the lowest IQ of any President in the past 60 years.
    No it wasn't, the average median household income dropped between 2000 and 2007. I would also like you to post the laws that Congress passed, Bush vetoed, and Congress overrode his veto since you believe Congress singlehandedly led us to this awful recession we are in. And just so you know the recession started in 2007 so you can't blame it on that Congress.
    How did he "win" the war on terror in Iraq? And he did not take out Osama Bin Laden assuming that's who you mean).
    Where's your proof?
    You have got to be kidding me.
    That's pretty vague. What do you mean by greatest time ever? Best recession ever?
    Define "amazingly well" and use proof not just speculation.
    You are an idiot: A Chart of Bush Lies about Iraq - A BuzzFlash Reader Commentary
    If you provide a link for that and prove your claims I will apologize for saying Bush lied.
    Why do liberals and Muslims ALWAYS devolve into personal attacks? It's SO pathetic! I almost didn't respond to this because of the personal attack, but I will. There are a few things I know VERY well including Islam and counterterrorism.
    CCR is Christian Conservative Republican. W does not do coke. Not for at least 30 years. And he has not had a drink for years, either, unlike your disgusting president who drinks, smokes AND does coke. W's IQ (125) is in the same range as most of the past presidents. He is wiser than all of them combined.
    Greatest time ever=record high DOW, housing, employment etc. This country was in AMAZING shape until the liberals took over CONgress in 07. By the end of the year we were screwed.
    The world's worst terrorist was Saddam Hussein. DUH! He took out 1.5 MILLION of his own people. We went to Iraq to take out Hussein. We did it. Mission accomplished. We got the violence down to almost nothing until your president screwed it all up. Now it's a mess.
    Anyone with an ounce of counterterrorism knowledge knows Saddam Hussein moved his stash to Syria, that Clinton dropped the ball by not taking out binLaden THREE TIMES when he had the chance, that Bush prevented dozens of terror attacks including two hits on Barack Hussein Obama, that Barack Hussein Obama is a complete and utter failure in EVERY aspect of DHS (as is Uncle Janet), and that Iran has threatened to wipe us and Israel out with its nukes within 2 years.
    Saddam general: WMDs in Syria
    YouTube - ‪The Saddam Connection To Osama‬‎
    Experts: War on Terrorism Has 'Crippled' Al-Qaida
    Last edited by chickie; 08-10-10 at 10:19 PM.

  10. #70
    Guru
    JohnWOlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Last Seen
    01-17-17 @ 08:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    3,594

    Re: New obama low 44%... Place your bets on how long it will take to get to the 30's

    chickie if you made a blog I would subscribe to the RSS, facebook, youtube, twitter, and newsletter.
    "We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying ten percent of his salary, and that’s crazy." -Reagan

Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •