• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would YOU vote for this guy?

Would you vote for this man for President?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 31.8%
  • No

    Votes: 15 68.2%

  • Total voters
    22
wrong--very few people who normally would vote for far left welfare-socialist types voted against Obama-Biden.

many people who normally would not did

really says what? proof? what about the people that just didnt vote, also if this is you argument how many people that usually vote right "just continued to do the same" LMAO sorry ou cant have it both ways

o now you say im wrong but then go to admit maybe a few did?
I thought I was wrong but yet im right?

you said people did not vote against him based on color now you are saying maybe a few did? make up you mind dont back pedal LOL

so again after your post the FACT I posted still remains its not wrong at all

LMAO thanks for letting me know
 
thinking rather than feeling is "wrong" to libs. But you re the one who is wrong-I know why lots of people you call "rednecks" voted against Obama-Biden. It is because Obama-Biden was the most anti gun ticket in history.

Stop trying to hijack the thread and change the subject to guns, just because you're losing the argument on the subject at hand: race. If you were a thinker instead of a feeler, you'd know better. ;)

TurtleDude said:
Given McCain was sort of pro gun and Palin could be an NRA poster-chick your insinuation that "hicks" or "rednecks" didn't approve of McCain's policies is an outright lie.

And given that 90%+ of blacks consistently vote for WHITE Democratic presidential candidates, your insinuation that blacks did not approve of Obama's policies is an outright lie.
 
Last edited:
thinking rather than feeling is "wrong" to libs. But you re the one who is wrong-I know why lots of people you call "rednecks" voted against Obama-Biden. It is because Obama-Biden was the most anti gun ticket in history. Given McCain was sort of pro gun and Palin could be an NRA poster-chick your insinuation that "hicks" or "rednecks" didn't approve of McCain's policies is an outright lie. most working class whites aren't in favor of losing jobs to less qualified minorities either-remind me which party pushes affirmative racism

Apparently misreprenting the other side is right to cons. God knows, we would not want an honest discussion.
 
really says what? proof? what about the people that just didnt vote, also if this is you argument how many people that usually vote right "just continued to do the same" LMAO sorry ou cant have it both ways

o now you say im wrong but then go to admit maybe a few did?
I thought I was wrong but yet im right?

you said people did not vote against him based on color now you are saying maybe a few did? make up you mind dont back pedal LOL

so again after your post the FACT I posted still remains its not wrong at all

LMAO thanks for letting me know

Obama won easily despite being the most radical leftist to be on the dem ticket

end of story
 
Apparently misreprenting the other side is right to cons. God knows, we would not want an honest discussion.

Honest discussion?

Like libs claiming that race had NOTHING to do with Obama winning

LOL
 
Obama won easily despite being the most radical leftist to be on the dem ticket

end of story

ok so i was right, you were wrong, you back pedaled and you have no answers so you're just going to bail out and or try to redirect, cool

got it :D
 
Stop trying to hijack the thread and change the subject to guns, just because you're losing the argument on the subject at hand: race. If you were a thinker instead of a feeler, you'd know better. ;)



And given that 90%+ of blacks consistently vote for WHITE Democratic presidential candidates, your insinuation that blacks did not approve of Obama's policies is an outright lie.

a moronic argument is made that "rednecks" did not favor McCain's policies

I point out that the McCain-Palin Ticket was strong pro gun, the dem ticket was the most anti gun in history

in other words, I assert a clear important policy issue that would have caused "trailer-trash rednecks" as you call them to favor McCain over the Gun hating lib ticket that has nothing to do with race.

You lose
 
ok so i was right, you were wrong, you back pedaled and you have no answers so you're just going to bail out and or try to redirect, cool

got it :D

more psychobabble

what sort of person would normally vote for a white radical liberal who was extremely anti gun that didn't vote for Obama on race?
 
Honest discussion?

Like libs claiming that race had NOTHING to do with Obama winning

LOL

So your excuse to being caught out being dishonest is to say "but Johnny did it too"?
 
more psychobabble

what sort of person would normally vote for a white radical liberal who was extremely anti gun that didn't vote for Obama on race?

LMAO keep telling your self its psychobabble thats just you way of redirecting and waving the white flag on a certain topic. you already admitted i was right please stay on topic, are you familiar with the term strawman? lmao

Facts
Some people voted FOR obama based on race
Some people voted AGAINST obama based on race
BOTH of the above issues are secondary issues to why he won
 
So your excuse to being caught out being dishonest is to say "but Johnny did it too"?

you are confused, I believe in what I said. I am not dishonest at all

I certainly don't pretend to say be a very liberal poster :mrgreen:
 
a moronic argument is made that "rednecks" did not favor McCain's policies

I point out that the McCain-Palin Ticket was strong pro gun, the dem ticket was the most anti gun in history

in other words, I assert a clear important policy issue that would have caused "trailer-trash rednecks" as you call them to favor McCain over the Gun hating lib ticket that has nothing to do with race.

You lose

And there are plenty of policy issues (real or imagined) that cause blacks to favor Obama over McCain: An expansive social safety net, unemployment benefits, anti-poverty programs, affirmative action, the criminal justice system, civil rights, the war in Iraq, etc.

You can agree with the position on those issues or not, but don't make a moronic argument that no policy reasons exist for blacks supporting Obama. If that were the case, then white Democratic presidential candidates wouldn't consistently get around 90% of the black vote.

You lose.
 
Last edited:
And there are plenty of policy issues that cause blacks to favor Obama over McCain: An expansive social safety net, unemployment benefits, anti-poverty programs, affirmative action, civil rights, the war in Iraq, etc.

You can agree with the position on those issues or not, but don't make a moronic argument that no policy reasons exist for blacks supporting Obama. If that were the case, then white Democratic presidential candidates wouldn't consistently get around 90% of the black vote.

You lose.

Bush was far more conservative than McCain and he got alot more of the black vote. LIke twice as much as McCain got

I sure don't remember Arnstrong Williams say he voting for Kerry
 
Bush was far more conservative than McCain and he got alot more of the black vote. LIke twice as much as McCain got

Maybe because not everyone adopts your simple-minded method of voting: Ranking all the candidates on a scale of how liberal or conservative they are, and voting for the one the farthest down whichever end of the spectrum they want. :roll:

TurtleDude said:
I sure don't remember Arnstrong Williams say he voting for Kerry

And I don't remember Joe Lieberman saying he was voting for Bush. Are you saying Joe Lieberman voted for McCain because of Obama's race?
 
Last edited:
more psychobabble

what sort of person would normally vote for a white radical liberal who was extremely anti gun that didn't vote for Obama on race?

LMAO keep telling your self its psychobabble thats just you way of redirecting and waving the white flag on a certain topic. you already admitted i was right please stay on topic, are you familiar with the term strawman? lmao

Facts
Some people voted FOR obama based on race
Some people voted AGAINST obama based on race
BOTH of the above issues are secondary issues to why he won
 
Maybe because not everyone adopts your simple-minded method of voting: Ranking all the candidates on a scale of how liberal or conservative they are, and voting for the one the farthest down whichever end of the spectrum they want. :roll:

you so just confused him
 
Short and Simple..........

brown_conference_speech.jpg



Would you vote for him??????

All politicians running for office make promises they can't keep to seduce the people into voting for them, including Bush, Clinton, and Obama, so what's the big deal?

If retards believe them, that's their problem.

ricksfolly
 
All politicians running for office make promises they can't keep to seduce the people into voting for them, including Bush, Clinton, and Obama, so what's the big deal?

If retards believe them, that's their problem.

ricksfolly

Please show how many of those he ran on. Also, how many of those are actually an honest representation?
 
Please show how many of those he ran on. Also, how many of those are actually an honest representation?

To make that determination, I'd have to have copies of all their speeches. I'm not about to wade through hundreds of records. Besides, the issue is those who believed the political promises, not the promises.

ricksfolly
 
Honest discussion?

Like libs claiming that race had NOTHING to do with Obama winning

LOL

Your argument is like saying that most people only drink milkshakes because they like chocolate.
 
Your argument is like saying that most people only drink milkshakes because they like chocolate.

He's making an overgeneralizing argument. I suspect he knows that.
 
Maybe because not everyone adopts your simple-minded method of voting: Ranking all the candidates on a scale of how liberal or conservative they are, and voting for the one the farthest down whichever end of the spectrum they want. :roll:



And I don't remember Joe Lieberman saying he was voting for Bush. Are you saying Joe Lieberman voted for McCain because of Obama's race?

Most people are far less sophisticated than you or I are. Most people don't spend time debating politics. Most people cannot even tell you the two sentators from their states. Most people cannot name the chief justice of the United States, or 3 of the associate justices. I can name everyone of them and the colleges and law schools they attended. I suspect you could do the same-or at least come close.

Most voters aren't really well educated. As Churchill noted, the greatest argument against democracy is to spend 5 minutes talking with an average voter. However, no other system is better and most are far far worse.

But Howard Stern's interviews of Obama voters was not only hilarious, but sadly rather truthful
 
Back
Top Bottom