Being against a military policy is not anti-military. I am against DADT too.
There is to the best of my knowledge no proof she is gay, and a friend of hers has called her strait(or so it was reported on TV today). Her orientation is also entirely irrelevant.
Her religious beliefs are entirely irrelevant unless there is evidence they would effect her rulings.
She has about as much experience as roughly 1/3 of the justices in our history have had.
Do you have any problems with anything actually affecting her ability to do the job properly, or just hysterics?